Group 4

 

Welcome to the latest TWO WEEK INTENSIVE on tonebase!

 

For the next two weeks either start learning OR take a Chopin mazurka in your repertoire to the next level through guidance and assignments from Jarred Dunn! Learn about stylistic advice, aspects of the dance and more!

 

Pianists of all levels are welcome. 

 

----------

Assignment #1: Seeing the Mazurka

 

1) Watch Mazurka Dance Lessons 1, 2, and 3: 

http://www.tance.edu.pl/en/lessons/show/dance/720

 

 

-Pay close attention to Lesson 3: the lesson builds rhythms from what we hear as a Waltz into a clear accent on 2nd beat, 3rd beat, and both 2nd/3rd beats

 

2) Learn one Mazurka

Choose one from the following suggested opuses for the whole TWI. 

Week 1: Practice the LH:

-Op. 6 nr. 1, nr. 2

-Op. 7 nr. 1, nr. 2

-Op. 24 nr. 1 or 2

-Op. 30 nr. 1 or 2

-Op. 67 any

- or a different mazurka

 

Practice Activities:

a) Identify/mark all articulation in LH parts.

b) Clap the rhythm, emphasize accents and count aloud (speak louder for accented beats, eg. "one, Two, THREE" or "one, TWO, Three" etc.) 

c) Identify/mark any unknown harmonic shifts or chords.

d) Find all cadences and notice unfamiliar accents (beat 2).

e) Voice tops of chords in LH or find a moving line (could be the middle notes of a chord that change).

f) Use RH for chords and LH for bass lines.

g) Circle any rests/pauses - they need to be heard.

 

Upload videos of your LH practicing/playing.

 

------------

 

ASSIGNMENT 2

 

Second Assignment: Continue your new Mazurka

Week 2: Practice the RH:

 

Listen to instruments, timbres, and moods in the following:

Kujawiak: https://youtu.be/RjV1bpxi0bc

Mazurek Dąbrowskiego: https://youtu.be/mTx45S-dQmQ?t=4

Chopin Mazurkas/Folk Mazurkas: https://youtu.be/n8OyddwnVbE

 

Look For/Listen For: 

a) Learn the soprano part (melody), always sing/scream with it when you play. Think of dancers in this video: https://youtu.be/p6svoYBEWCs?t=10

b) Add ornaments after you learned the rhythms of the melody.

c) Dotted rhythms and triplets must sound distinctly different (no slackened dotted-eighth/sixteenths).

d) Accents on beats two and three can be subtle: try different levels of pressure/weight on the keys, to create at least four different accent types: sudden accent, leaning/swaying accent, light accent, heavy accent.

e) Remember that recording yourself is the best way to find out if you're actually doing what you intend. Record your melodic playing/singing/screaming whenever you practice.

 

Upload videos of your RH practicing/playing. 

-------

 

  • Sign-Up : starting July 14
  • Course Period: July 17-31
  • Class Size: ALL are welcome!
  • Optional check-In via Zoom: July 27th 9am PT

CHECK IN VIDEO!

 

https://youtu.be/rvIjk9LS1Qw

134replies Oldest first
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Active threads
  • Popular
  • Hello! 

     

    I am excited to learn a mazurka as it's something I have yet to practice and explore. I also love folk dancing, so this should be fun! 

    Like 1
    • Rachel Doornink can't wait to hear you play - if you love folk dancing, this will definitely be an exciting two weeks. Good luck with your Mazurka - which one did you pick?

      Like
    • Jarred Dunn Looking through my library of printed books, Op. 7 is one I have a Henle copy of, so I think I'll go for that! :) 

      Like 1
    • Rachel Doornink Go for it!  

      Like
  • Welcome Everyone! Witaj (PL = welcome)! I'm happy to see so many of you wanting to improve your Chopin Mazurka playing. I'm going to start replying to comments now and hope to see your work soon!

    Like 2
  • Hello Everyone, Hello Jarred Dunn, 

    Thank You for this great opportunity to share a workshop on Chopin Mazurka. I never played a Chopin Mazurka, so why not try it now! With this opportunity. I will try, try to do my best. So I choose the op 30 no 1. I already print the score at work, today. I will start reading it tonight at my piano. Left hand and right hand. It's a dance, wath I understood. So the accent is on the second and 3thd beat, if I understood correctly. This saturday I have my piano course, we will work on my Chopin pieces, an Etude and a Nocturne, and I will had this Mazurka at my piano lesson. I think my teacher will love it. 

    Like 1
    • Aline Valade the op30 nr1 is more accented on 2nd beat, the rhythm being 2 eighths followed by half note. Great choice, can’t wait to hear you play this! Do familiarize yourself with the other c minor mazurka op56 nr3, and the middle of op41 nr3 in A-flat major has a similar c minor section.

      Like 1
  • If people serching for free scores, I find this link. I though share it with all of you. https://sheetmusicpoint.com/composer/c/chopin/piano/mazurkas/

    Like
    • Mark Forry
    • Retired IT, Recovering Musician
    • Mark_Forry
    • 1 yr ago
    • Reported - view

    Hello fellow Mazurkaphiles! Hello Jarred Dunn!

    Mark Forry here. Recently retired from a career in IT, returning to a deeper engagement with music and musicology. Amateur pianist (self-assessment: ToneBase Level 6) and singer, some sing-along guitar, earlier involvement with Eastern European folk music instruments. Originally from California, now living in southern Hungary. 

    Mazurkas are a central focus of my piano study. I’m working my way through them in order; op. 6, 7, 17, and 24 are more-or-less under my hands (although they need frequent attention). Considering jumping to a later opus and working back.

    BIG thank you, Jarred Dunn! Your workshop last year rocked my Mazurka World, esp. the insight about differentiating between mazur, oberek, and kujawiak rhythms – it makes SO much sense, esp. with Chopin’s tempo markings! I’m rethinking how I play all of them, including getting the tempos up on the oberek-inspired pieces. Thank you for continuing with this series!

    Hoping to post op.6 nos. 3&4 (I hear them together) if I can make a clean video (very nervous in front of listeners and camera). 

    Na Zdrowie! 

    Like 2
    • Mark Forry dzień dobry, witaj! It’s great you’re going through the entire Chopin mazurkas in order. Looking forward to hearing your op6 nr.3&4, and keep the questions coming! 

      Like 1
    • Mark Forry
    • Retired IT, Recovering Musician
    • Mark_Forry
    • 1 yr ago
    • Reported - view

    Jarred Dunn   Thanks for the encouragement. I’ll have plenty of questions, here’s the first:

    Do we know if Chopin played (or encouraged his students to play) complete mazurka opuses together; for example, to perform all 5 mazurkas in Op. 7 in the same concert? Did he think of the mazurkas in an opus as being related? Or were the opus contents assembled at a later date by Chopin (or a publisher or editor)? I’ve been playing the 4 opuses that I know as 4 suites, each one seems to me to have its own dramatic arc, but maybe I’m projecting. 

    Any thoughts on this, from you or other participants? 
    (Sorry if this posting is a repeat.)

    Like 2
    •  great question. From what we know of Chopin’s students and the works they studied with him, mazurkas typically come as a package deal. They are certainly organized with an arc in mind and while they can be performed individually, they sound best in entire cycles. The harmonic links between mazurkas are subtle but once you know them well, it’s more fulfilling to do an entire opus. Op6 has five mazurkas, Op7 has four: the Paderewski version justifies Op6 with 4 and Op7 with 5 rather this less convincingly than Ekier argued for Op6 with 5 and Op7 with 4 (with all due worship to my roots having learned Chopin from Paderewski editions). Chopin originally planned four mazurkas for each opus, but added the c major to op6 at a later stage and since he was directly connected to the French Edition, which published the c major as op6 nr5, it is almost impossible he intended it for op7. The German Edition published the c major as op7 but this was most probably an error. 

      Like 3
      • Mark Forry
      • Retired IT, Recovering Musician
      • Mark_Forry
      • 1 yr ago
      • Reported - view

      Jarred Dunn Wow - that's a revelation! So that short C major mazurka was intended to follow op6 no4 in eb minor, and not follow op7 no4 in Ab major? I'll have to rethink both these opuses, I've gotten used to playing the C major as attaca from op7 no4.

      Very happy to hear that mazurka opuses are indeed intended as entire cycles. I'd welcome any further insights you have about connecting mazurkas within opuses.

      Thanks!

      Like 1
    • Mark Forry Yes, the short C major is Op. 6, not Op. 7. Connecting mazurkas within opuses is a complex topic I'll discuss with a few examples during our Zoom meet-up. But if you're looking at the later works, observe the connections between the keys (eg., Op. 50: G major - A-flat major - C-sharp minor = nr. 2 and nr. 3 are in a dominant-tonic relationship).

      Like 1
    • Mark Forry
    • Retired IT, Recovering Musician
    • Mark_Forry
    • 1 yr ago
    • Reported - view

    Jarred Dunn and all,

    Next question, a big and perennial one: pedaling, esp. indications of pedaling in the score. (I’m using the Paderewski edition.)

    How literally should we interpret a lack of pedaling instruction? Taking the example of Op. 6 No. 2 that Harriet Kaplan  is working on, the “bagpipe” introduction has no pedal indication; should this be taken literally and not pedaled at all?

    Other examples in Op. 17 No. 4:

    -       Mm. 1-4 and final measures, no pedaling at all?

    -       Mm. 36-42, pedaling only on the first two beats, the third explicitly not?

    -       Mm. 109-123, the pedaling is indicated in parentheses; why? 

    As always, your comments much appreciated!

    Like 2
    • Mark Forry that's a great question and a highly interesting one! As a humble amateur, I will just tentatively offer one general comment: with the last Chopin piece I worked on, the Polonaise-Fantaisie, my teacher insisted on taking Chopin's pedal markings (and yes, the ones in the Henle edition are his own and are quite specific) very seriously, at least as a starting point until the piece was learned really, really well. In the slow middle section, that required tremendous discipline and the best possible finger legato I could muster. It didn't mean that I could never use any pedal where it wasn't written, but there had to be a good musical or technical reason for it, and it had to be controlled and tasteful. I'm trying a similar approach for the Mazurka I'm working on now. I would love to hear from Jarred Dunn if it is known whether there are differences in how specific Chopin was in his pedal indications between different pieces and/or different periods, and how reliable and to-be-taken-seriously the markings are in various editions?

      Like 2
    • Mark Forry The bagpipe isn't the only possibility for the 5th drones - I believe it isn't pedal-marked because Chopin might have been recalling the three-stringed bass (mazanki) that is plucked and resonates until the next note. The articulation between quarter and half note is the opportunity for a real break in sound like a plucked string followed by a period when the sounds resonates off the board (not like a lira korbowa or so-called hurdy-gurdy). I play the introduction with no pedal because it helps show contrasting articulations in the drones + legato melody.

      Op. 17 Nr. 4:

      -mm. 1-4/129-132: pedal discreetly between each chord or not at all - the inner voice which introduces the melody (B-C-D) in m. 5 needs to be clear enough that we recognize it in all subsequent places.

      -mm. 36-42: pedal as indicated in First French Edition - Paderewski - Ekier (https://s9.imslp.org/files/imglnks/usimg/c/c9/IMSLP398169-PMLP02281-BnF_btv1b52500413m.pdf)

      -mm. 109-123: pedal is Paderewski's and corresponds to the hand-span of most pianists as unable to reach the upper notes; whereas Chopin's piano allowed him to notate a bass as dotted-half notes (=pedal) in an A organ point (tonic pedal). In the manuscript Chopin indicated that his piano neither needed pedal nor was it desirable to communicate the transparency of the passage, but Paderewski added it because it might be necessary given the nature of the bass-tenor relationship in the passage.
       

      Like 1
    • Alexander Weymann Chopin was specific with pedal, and every Chopin enthusiast knows he was marvellously discrete about using it such that it never disturbed but rather charmed the listener. Chopin's pedal markings flatter the delicate nuances of his harmony and in many cases show us that finger pedal is a terrific skill in achieving an artistic distinction between one voice and another.  The Henle reports Chopin's autograph of Op. 61 faithfully. In the late and last works, Chopin's pedal markings are strictly connected to thematic, harmonic, and new formal innovations. Furthermore, I find Chopin's later works demand more subtlety and colour shading in their repeatings of the same melodic figures that have no pedal markings (eg. Op. 56 nr. 1 and 3) = extract as much beauty from the piano's natural state as possible by using the inbuilt counterpoint of each voice. Mazurkas, particularly, need a special focus on instrumental resonances (lira korbowa, cymbały, basy, fidele) to really know when to hold a tone, release it, and how to move from one to the next so that the piano sounds like a band of vibraphones, chordophones, idiophones, aerophones, etc. Pedal can sometimes help the piano's inbuilt potential for resonance to be accentuated at just the right moment so as to invoke the sound of a bagpipe, but other times it can destroy the nuance as to render our finger's effort meaningless.

      Like 3
    • Jarred Dunn super helpful; thank you so much for sharing all this excellent information and your thoughts on the subject! Since you now have mentioned in many different comments the various instruments that Chopin would/might have had in mind when composing these mazurkas and that we are supposed to think of and internally hear when playing them, are you at some point going to show us some examples of what they are and what they sound like? :-)

      Like 2
    • Alexander Weymann We have a WINNER. I have been waiting for that exact question! I'm now going to post in all groups now a guide to the PL folk instruments.

      Like 5
      • Mark Forry
      • Retired IT, Recovering Musician
      • Mark_Forry
      • 1 yr ago
      • Reported - view

      Jarred Dunn Thanks for mentioning the specific instruments. I'm an ethnomusicologist, and although I'm less familiar with Polish music, my focus has been SE Europe (mostly Croatia, Serbia, and Hungary), where similar instruments can be found. It's perhaps beyond the scope of this class to delve into the specifics, but I would love to know, for example, what folk instruments Chopin is likely to have heard and in which combinations. For example, you can hear modern Polish folk music bands where fiddles, bagpipes and plucked bass play together, but would that have been the case in Chopin's time?

      It's an intriguing creative challenge to imagine what instruments Chopin might have had in mind for specific passages and try to find corresponding sonorities on modern pianos. Doing so would seem to be faithful to Chopin's attention to the nuances of sonority as you've characterized them here. 

      Like 1
      • Mark Forry
      • Retired IT, Recovering Musician
      • Mark_Forry
      • 1 yr ago
      • Reported - view

      Jarred Dunn and Alexander Weymann , thanks for mentioning "finger pedal", I hadn't heard the term before. I've been using the principle to wean myself away from overreliance on pedal in Bach, but it hadn't occurred to me until recently to attempt the same with Chopin. I love this notion of brining out the subtleties of Chopin's nuance with a balance between pedaling and no pedaling. So many creative and technical challenges -- I guess that's why we all play piano ... 😉 

      Like 2
    • Mark Forry  finger pedaling is mentioned many times in Ekier’s performance commentaries and the introduction to the National Edition (do you have this?). It affects the technical work of Chopin's music. You can find many passages in etudes and build antennae for this skill in every type of Chopin piece.

      Like 2
    • Mark Forry over the summers of 1824 and 1825 (age 14 and 15), Chopin had summer vacations in Szafarnia (https://szafarnia.art.pl). In his letters, Chopin writes about the "squeaky, semi-tonal, off-key voices" of the lady singers during rowdy dances (24 Aug 1824). Chopin colourfully reports an evening of dance and music after vodka drinking, having heard basetla (cello), three-string bass, fiddle, monochord (25 Aug 1825). It is not impossible that other instruments were part of the dance gatherings, we assume he heard most or all of Polish traditional instruments.

      Like 2
      • Mark Forry
      • Retired IT, Recovering Musician
      • Mark_Forry
      • 1 yr ago
      • Reported - view

      Jarred Dunn Once again, my sincere thanks. This TWI is completely changing my understanding of Chopin in general and mazurkas in particular. So grateful!

      Like 2
Like Follow
  • 1 yr agoLast active
  • 134Replies
  • 634Views
  • 15 Following

Home

View all topics