Week 2: Applying Harmony and Form to Performance Interpretation on Chopin Preludes (Part 1)

Let's welcome Dr. Eloise Kim who will be guiding the next two weeks of this Chopin Challenge with a "Two-Week Intensive!"

 

Assignment #1

Video link for Week 1: https://youtu.be/4hZ900JZSVU

https://youtu.be/4hZ900JZSVU

 

1. Choose any Chopin Prelude of your choice. Assess what form the piece is in: for example, ternary form. Label in your annotations of phrase groups, larger structures, and sections.

 

2. To the best of your abilities: write down a roman numeral or chord analysis on the music, key areas, modulations, tonicizations, etc. If you are new to music theory, you are welcome to label just chord harmony or circle certain chords in the music that you 'react' to when listening to the work.

3. Please feel free to share your annotations here on the community platform for feedback!

47 replies

null
    • Personal trainer
    • Judy_Kuan.1
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi  , thanks for the motivation to do this analysis! I tend to do really big picture harmonic analysis (to help me keep track of where I am in the piece), and then get detailed with the chord analysis when I'm struggling with learning/memorizing a particular section.

    For Chopin 53, the main theme is quite straightforward and repetitive (V-I-V-I-V-I etc), but the interludes are surprisingly tricky (which makes sense since they're meant to sound ambiguous and meander into different key areas).

    In any case, here is my scribble analysis on a spare score (the Henle hardcopy I'm learning from is pretty illegible at this point). I did do this away from the piano so I'll have to revisit tomorrow to see if I still agree with myself 😅

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      So happy to hear! Thank you for sharing your insights with us again, and all the best to the next steps! 👋

    • Grace.11
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi Dr Kim,  I need help with analysis.  Attached is my annotated Mazurka 47 op 67 no 4.  It has A B C A format.   With A and B in A minor and C in A major. I identified the chords as best I could ( A min, E M, F, B, M, D min, G min) ,but could not discern any underlying logic for changing keys.  I circled measured in red where I saw a deviation from the pattern and would like to understand better.  Thank you very much.  I look forward to your insight 

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      Dear Grace, Thank you so much for participating in this challenge and sharing your terrific work! Excellent job identifying the form and also notating the chord analysis. Just a few feedback:

      You are correct that measures 17-32 has some differing material so hints a bit of a new section. But to correct the form of the entire work: I would identify this as a ternary form: section "A" being m. 1-33, section "B" being m. 34-52 (A Major section), and again section "A" going back to m. 1-33 until "Fine."

      The main reason for this is because m. 16-32 is not too much of a drastic contrast in the rhythmic and melodic motifs from m. 1-15, nor is there a huge harmonic change from the original key. But measure 34 gives an obvious change to the ear because of 1) key change to A Major (which is the parallel key to a minor) and 2) a more contrasting rhythmic/melodic material in the RH melody from what we heard in m. 1-16.  However, I will add that analyzing forms can sometimes be subjective, so how our ears react to it can be a new 'correct' answer individually :)

      I have added my analysis on the Chopin Mazurka and attached it here. Once again, terrific work on the chord identification. Most of the chords you have circled in red are what we call, secondary dominants. These chords are chromatic harmony. For example, when we have a B Dominant 7th chord (by the way: I notated dominant 7th chords as either "Dom 7" or i.e.: "B7; they both mean the same thing). B Dominant 7th involves notes B-D#-F#-A. We do not have a D# or F# in the key of a minor, so this is a 'chromatic' harmony. Therefore, if you see how the chord resolves in the next measure, it resolves to E Major--which is the V of both a minor and A Major. Therefore, we label this as a V7/V: called a secondary dominant. In case this is new to you, I have attached a few pages from a Theory textbook that explains about Secondary dominant chords. We have another secondary dominant chord G#7 in m. 40-41 which is the V7 of c# minor. Therefore, in roman numeral analysis, we would notate this as the V7 of iii because c# minor is the iii chord of A Major.

      In addition: in romantic repertoire, it is not necessary that we have to identify every chord for each beat. For example, the second beat of m. 45 involves an E-A-D in the LH which is really essentially just an E7 chord with sus 4 ("A" is the 4th scale degree above E, and that 4th scale degree "A" resolving to the "G#" in the next beat).

      I hope this explanation comes in helpful and gives further ideas for future studying, but if you would like any clarification, please feel free to ask me anytime. Thank you so much again!

    • Conrad_Winn
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

       😂😂

    • Conrad_Winn
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    3B373484-0D26-49EB-A2C1-4F1C8624838D.heic

     

    I will give you the best I can do at this point since I lack at this time the formal classification of the chords...I can see what you are trying to do with harmonic analysis...the classification of a chord within a key and it relationship with the key and the other chords...If its a I or a IV or V whatever I can't say...the piece I have chosen is Chopin's Prelude in e minor...I hope you can see the score above but if not I will attempt to describe it...'this is a piece that speaks to a drowning individual...drowning in sorrow, in water whatever...First of all its in a minor key so its going to be a bummer...It shows an individual that is slowly sinking...He attempts to overcome this weight on a couple of occasions but eventually is overcome and relents to his fate...maybe...

    The first measure's first note is a b at a low frequency compared to others and then moves into a higher b..Its as if he is under water with the first b and then pops his head out to begin the piece..the first phrase maybe from measure 1 to 4 and consists of a series of tension and release...perhaps its I to IV with the C to B repetitions...The second phrase may be measure 4 to 9 where the b to a is another tension and release but at a lower tone showing he is slowly sinking..Measure 9 seems to be leading up to another tension and release but at even a lower level-A to F....In measure 12 he tries to come back with tension at the d in the triplet and he does a little with the tension and release raising a little to C-B...The next phrase is from 13 to 18 he does come back higher with a C-B tension release except is a flurry of struggle he raises the tension with a G in measure 16. and a C in measure 17 but alas he relents to the pressure to a tension between between the F and E...I find it interesting that in the last measure with the three chords..Listening to the chords and how they come through in terms of the salient note or fundamental frequency of the chord...the first chord is high compared to the others..then he expresses a low sounding chord and then a chord in-between..Possibly hinting at future hope or just the last time with his head above...Hope I'm not too far in left field...conrad

      • Conrad_Winn
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

       I needed to say that knowing the above I sometimes till increase the tension along a phrase with increase amplitude...Also concerning the tension notes measure 16 and 17 I will do a little rubato and prolongate the note with increased loudness..I certainly would make the measures 16 and 17 louder with more tension to be released back down softer...the last chord I would play it softly in-between the others to signify surrender....

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi Conrad! This is a really wonderful analysis, and I am very impressed! I want to also note that the purpose of this exercise + first assignment was exactly getting to this style of description. And it is no problem at all if you are not at the stage to feel comfortable doing a chord-by-chord harmonic analysis or understanding roman numerals. In the end, that type of work eventually leads us to the same conclusion/goal: deciding on performance interpretations--which exactly what you are doing already now with your description.

      I was able to see your first page photo in the attachment. I liked how you marked the phrase groups, and circled the notes that give a reaction to your ears. The imagery of a person drowning--whether physically or mentally (or both,) is certainly the emotional aspect of this piece and a very poetic interpretation. I love how you are feeling the colors of certain chords and pitches in the Prelude to help make decisions on where the building and releasing of tensions are happening, and how this can affect timings. Bravo!

      Thank you so much for sharing your insights in this challenge! You may have seen this video on our Tonebase YouTube channel, but Seymour Bernstein has an excellent video on this very same prelude that I think you might enjoy watching in your free time. And in case it helps for future learning, here attached is the chordal/roman numeral analysis of the Chopin Prelude in e minor that is available online. Hope to see you join in our next week's assignment (which started live yesterday)!

    • Andrew_Smith
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    Hello Dr. Kim -- I'm sure you are very busy, and you have spent a lot of time replying to our analysis, so thank you for that. I have attached my analysis of Etude in E op.10 no.3. I am not sure how to label chords in m.43 and m.45, and also 57-59. Please don't feel that you need to give any reply (are we finished with the two-week time window?); this exercise was very interesting for me. Cheers. 

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi Andrew! Thank you so much for joining this challenge! Thrilled to hear this was a positive learning experience for you, and I was very impressed with your written analysis that you shared. Bravo. The details are great, and I certainly agree with you that understanding form is beneficial for lesson in songwriting (if that is an area of your interest). Songwriting is often in a similar form: A B A or A A B A, etc. except most of the time, lot less complex than Chopin Etudes ;)

      To answer your question regarding measures 43 and 45: there is no need to label these chords for the purpose of 'harmonic analysis' as they are mainly 'passing' into the B Major arrival on measures 44 and m. 46. If we want to be specific though, these measures (43 and 45) are outlinin f# diminished chords and B Dominant with added 4. But there is not a need to add in a 'roman numeral' to measures like this since they are helping us transition into the Dominant. I hope that makes sense. For measures 57-59, this is also the same idea in that the RH is applying more chromaticism for coloring use, and the LH is tonicizing our E Major with the back and forth E to B LH bass line.

      Thank you again for sharing your very detailed and wonderful analysis. As a general advice: how you can utilize this analysis for performance interpretation is that this type of work enables us to 'listen' to the piece differently at a more deeper level. For example, how do these harmony changes relate to another, and what can I do as a performer to entail that? Dynamics, timing, etc. can all be decided based on what we analyzed. The structure of the form: what is happening in the B section VS the outer A's, and how can I create a new character?

      I hope this gives some ideas for your performance of this piece. I love this Chopin Etude, and it is certainly a challenging yet gorgeous work to perform. If you are planning to perform this piece next week, I look forward to seeing your performance!

      • Andrew_Smith
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

       Dear Dr. Kim, 

      Thank you so much! I really appreciate all of those helpful comments; and now you have motivated me to get the piece together by next week. Nothing like a deadline! Thanks again!

    • Vanessa_Ellermann
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    I have a question about fingering for Prelude in A flat major Op. 28 No. 17 - I’m having to make decisions about which hand is over and under in playing the chords. Frequently, it fits the hands better if I play the lowest note on the treble clef with LH and highest note on the bass clef w/RH. Is there any reason why I should not do that? It makes the score harder to read, but easier to play that way. I’m wondering why Chopin composed it this way.

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi Vanessa! Thank you for joining this challenge! Certainly happy to help with this. There is nothing wrong with voicing the way you described, if that is more comfortable. It is awkward indeed to play with the current way it is written on the sheet music. But if you were to try the way it is written: what would help is, for example in the first chord: to take that C in the RH thumb as written and play the A-flat Major chord with the top E-flat in the LH thumb. As for the choreography, the thumbs will form a 'X' shape: you would need to have the LH thumb above the RH thumb for this first measure. In general, the LH will be slightly above/inside keys than the RH, in order for them to less collide.

      The reasoning behind playing this as written (voicing wise) is to entail that the RH melody sings (because the thumb is a heavy finger). The slight danger in taking the LH playing the C while the RH plays the E-flat is that the C tone will not be heard as strongly. The same would apply for anytime we have this similar moments.

      I encourage you to try it out and see if that works for you. And if you need me to clarify anything, please feel free to ask. However, if this method does not work: it is absolutely fine to do what you are doing as long as we are grabbing all the voices :)

      My thought on why Chopin did this is to keep the hands closer together to create a more warmer atmosphere in that register and also emotionally: create a 'closed' feeling that later opens up in the Prelude when the hands get more spread apart. Thank you again for joining this challenge, and all the best to your learning of this piece!

      • Vanessa_Ellermann
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

       Thank you! I will try it as written. I like your explanation about the music being intimate and warm when the thumbs are crossed and then opening up, expanding, as the hands play further apart. This is my second attempt at trying to learn this piece. The teacher I had in college assigned me several preludes and this is one I just didn’t “get” musically at the time.

    • Amateur piano enthusiast
    • Marc_M
    • 2 wk ago
    • Reported - view

    Hello , life has been crazy and I'm woefully late to finishing the harmonic analysis, but here's my first pass!

    Chopin Etude 10 4 Marc Notes

    I've been practicing the piece for some time now, but finally doing an analysis of the harmony has been a bit of a revelation, for example, identifying why exactly those extra strong moments feel so decisive (e.g. they have a clear V7-I cadence to the original key after a long period of drifty chromatic diminished stuff far from home).

    I've never taken a formal music theory class so there may be odd gaps in my knowledge; any feedback would be appreciated.

    I'm not sure how to interpret all those hairpins. I'm tempted to go agogic all the way, since that would make the technical problems easier, but then again, I worry I'd overdo it. Maybe the small closed hairpins mean a slight decel, and the opening ones indicate picking up a little speed? Measures 29-33 I struggle with and am tempted to super expand the tempo, haha. Same with the last few bars.

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 2 wk ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi Marc! So great to see you, and thank you for joining this Chopin intensive! It's fantastic to see you working on a great repertoire list every time, and this Chopin Etude is definitely a technical and musical challenge! Thank you very much for sharing your analysis.

      Impressive work on the chord recognitions: I am glad you annotated them as this will come in helpful for detail practice work and eventual memorization in the long run too. I would not worry too much about being fully trained in music theory, at least for the purpose of our assignment here. Applying what you can with your knowledge is great--and also understanding the phrase groups, overall form of this etude, and paying attention to the dynamic and articulation details is fantastic. I am happy to hear this analysis work helped you discover new ideas of interpretation!

      Regarding the hairpins, I agree with you that it could be an indication of some timing suggestions; however, I do also want to add that this type of timings (push and pull) should be applied with a 'grain of salt.' Ultimately, this is still an etude, so we want to keep our general rhythmic pulse/the heartbeat of the music as steady as possible with the same energy we would apply if we did the 'push and pull.' With that said, whenever we have those 'arrivals' such as cadences, those can be applied with a slight time at the end to indicate a strong arrival or new beginning. I hope this makes sense, but happy to clarify if you have any questions.

      The idea of our performance for this particular etude, is to maintain the energy, character, and stamina while keeping structure--that is indeed challenging to do. But makes the performance a lot more engaging and effective. As a challenge practice: I suggest you to try playing this piece from beginning to end--at a very slow speed and try to keep the pulse as rigid as possible. This is actually a BIG challenge to do, but somehow makes it easier when it is time to start adding velocity.

      Thank you again for joining this challenge Marc! Happy to see you here again :)

    • chuck_levin
    • 13 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Chopin Fantasia, , op.49

     

    Very sorry but this is a very messy analysis to a very messy (harmonically and structurally speaking) piece.  I didn't have the time to do a more detailed analysis after measure 223, but hopefully this provides a useful start. Also, I'm presenting it this way because it seemed too complicated to convey a lot of this in the score with the simple letters and numbers: 

     

    Measures 1-4 - establishes march tempo and 4-bar theme in f

     

    Measures 5-8 - 4-bar theme, with V of III and full cadence in the relative major of A flat, and extension of phrase by two measures, coming to stronger full cadence in III, and an immediate V7 of f and resolution back to tonic.

     

    Measure 16: substitution in main theme of flat fifth (C flat) which becomes the enharmonic equivalent of V of E major - a foreign key - but in measure 18, the enharmonic equivalent of I 7 in E is scored as a vii7 with ambiguous root, resolving to f minor two bars later (measure 20), through sequence from I in A flat to Neapolitan second, then V of V in f.

     

    Measures 21-28, 29- 36 - expansion of initial march theme to 8 bars, modulating through F, B flat, D flat, and back to f.

     

    Measures 37-42: opening march theme fragmented and serving as transition to second theme of triplet figures beginning measure 43.

     

    Measures 43 -57: triplet figures coming to half cadence at measure 53 in e flat (could be major or minor), then progressing by measures 58-64 through f and D flat, to what appears to be a long descending stepwise passage appearing to be V 7 of G flat, but at bar 67-68 scale tones of d natural, d flat, and c natural are introduced - the V of the tonic home key of f.

     

    Measure 68 - begins a new agitato syncopated theme over the triplet figure lasting nine bars, to yet a new theme a tempo in A Flat (Measure 77) of four bars, repeated in the lower octave, then twisting at bar 85 into a sequence between vii 7 in E flat and vii 7 in f, vii of 7 in G (measure 90) which doubles as V of IV at measures 91-99, resolving to a c minor tonic at measure 93 - the beginning of yet a new 4-bar theme group, repeating itself in E Flat at measure 97, leading to new 2-note slurred sequences over the triplets (measures 99 - 108) but staying in or close to E Flat, introducing at measure 109 another march-type theme but seemingly unrelated to the initial march, and staying in E Flat until measure 119 when it again becomes harmonically ambiguous with a seemingly fleet transposition to c minor but lack of cadence (maybe a half cadence represented at measures 120-121), than V of A major (measures 121-123), before moving enharmonically to a IV in E flat (measure 124) where the bass "b" is an appogiatura to the following ii(second inversion) chord in E flat, which again re-establishes itself through a full cadence at measures 126-127, at which point a new 8-measure strict march theme is introduced and repeated, and at measure 142-143, instead of a resolution to the tonic of E Flat, dissolves momentarily at measure 143 into another ambiguous seventh chord - a vii of E? Thus begins a chromiatic sequence through vii of E , vii7 of E, (measures 146-147), and vii7 of D flat (measures 149-153).

     

    Then in another surprise harmonic twist, Chopin writes unison octaves with the root of V in D flat, but instead of resolving to there, moves chromatically down to unison G octaves, setting up a reprise of earlier theme, but in c minor, transitioning through e flat minor and vii7 of B flat, seemingly landing in that key between measures 161-163. But in measure 164, it becomes apparent that the prior I in B flat served as a III in G Flat major, as a reprise of a separate earlier theme now reoccurs in that key (Measures 164-171).

     

    At measure 172, a vii 7 of V in the sweeping triplets leads to D Flat, and then at measure 176 back to E flat via a vii7 of ii. At measure 184, Chopin trades the E Flat major for minor, which serves as a springboard to the parallel major of G Flat triplets where, with unison octaves again, this section terminates.

     

    The Lento Sostenuto begins at measure 199 with the sharp key signature of B, continuing through measure 222. B is the home key, but between measures 207 and 215 is a rich sequence of chromatically and diatonically descending chords yielding more harmonic ambiguity until the resolution at measures 214-215.

     

    Measure 223 seems to represent a sort of recapitulation, loosely speaking, as earlier themes are reprised, moving through a number of keys chromatically and enharmonically through the related keys of f, B flat, D flat, and A flat, with the piece ending in the relative major of A flat, rather than the "home" key of f.

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 12 days ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi Chuck! This is a really fantastic and thorough analysis you have done. I am very impressed. Thank you so much for sharing this! I am sure that your analysis here will come in helpful for anyone else learning this Chopin Fantasie Op. 49. This is the beauty of our platform that we can all share our individual knowledges and ideas with one another. :) Bravo.

      Great work on notating the secondary dominant and secondary leading tones. All of your details on the harmonic content are superbly done too.. These observations help see how the chromaticism works in this piece, making it even more interesting at another level. Excellent analysis about the B Dominant 7 chord at measure 16. Indeed this is involving the flat fifth of the original key: f minor, using B as the enharmonic of C-flat. And this B Dominant 7 resolves to E Major.

      This work is unique in the sense that it is really a musical narrative, a "fantasy," almost like a story-telling. The title of a "fantasy" symbolizes that we are not quite following a typical musical structure, but entering a journey of several destinations.

      The first 42 measures (before the first double bar line) starts with a march theme as indicated. Then at measure 43, the music becomes more agitated with a more frequent change of harmony, and the rhythmic content of the eighth note triplets certainly give more direction and excitement. When we get into the two against three poly-rhythms, octaves, etc. this creates an atmosphere that is much more tumultuous. But should still be performed with good control to make it even more effective. Of course, as you already marked above: The lento sostenuto is a chorale and creates a dreamy quality in the mood. Using the key of B Major which is a very remote key from the original f minor. This seems completely irrelevant in every way to f minor, but unique in the sense that Lento sostenuto section ends with the F# Dominant 7 chord (V7 of B), which Chopin shortly changes to a G-flat, the Neapolitan of f minor, creating a swift change back to the home key.

      And indeed, how unique and unexpected is it that the piece ends in the relative Major of A-Flat Major. Many pieces end in the parallel Major but it is quite rare to end at the relative. So once again, Chopin is breaking the typical 'structure' of how other music is typically done. Perhaps that choice of Major key ending symbolizes a hope for a new beginning despite this being the final statement of the piece.

      You already did such great work, so my comments here are really only just re-iterating everything you already mentioned and hopefully giving some insights into how you can apply the interpretations into your performance.

      Thank you so much again, Chuck! This was fantastic work, and I hope you get to share your performance of it with our Tonebase community someday :)

      • chuck_levin
      • 12 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Thank you for your review, Dr. Kim, and for filling in some important details.  I haven't done this level of analysis for a LONG time, and this exercise has convinced me that I need to! In addition, it has helped inform me regarding tempi, which had been all over the place.  I'm planning to submit a recording for the party.  Thanks again -- chuck

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 12 days ago
      • Reported - view

      Great to hear, Chuck! And impressive work to you again. I look forward to watching your recording for the performance party here at Tonebase :) All the best to your continuous learning experience, and thank you for joining this intensive!

    • Roy_JamesPike
    • 13 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Coming to this very late as we have been travelling. The good news is that one of my targets from Week One was to review all of the Chopin pieces that I studied many years' ago. That's not as challenging as it sounds as there were only a few.  The good thing is that Preludes 7 and 20 were included and I did play through those again in Week 1.

    Thanks Eloise for the reminder to return to the Theory classes on Tonebase to consolidate my understanding of harmonic analysis going forward. Thanks also for pointing out that Bach's preludes are chromatic and use the parallel minors, whereas Chopin uses the circle of 5ths with the relative minors.

      • Eloise_Kim
      • 12 days ago
      • Reported - view

      Thank you so much, Roy! Welcome and happy to have you join us :). What a delight that it worked out that the Preludes I mentioned in my video were Chopin works you studied this week. And yes, the Theory classes on Tonebase are very informative + wonderful. Feel free to check out some of the attachments I added to the responses here in this week that might come in useful for supplement studying too. My pleasure to be of help in any way I can.

      If you are planning to join the Chopin performance next week, I look forward to hearing your performance!

Content aside

  • 7 Likes
  • 12 days agoLast active
  • 47Replies
  • 349Views
  • 19 Following