Week 2 Thread: The Era of Haydn and Mozart!
Welcome to the Main Thread for the third week of "Mozart & Haydn - Music from the 18th Century" challenge!
- Make sure you've read the guidelines before replying (<- click)
- Watch the kickoff livestream! (<- click)
This week, we will talk about the different ways composers were trained during the 18th century and how they could achieve such high productivity through schemas and patterns
Look at a different piece by the same composer you are studying and try to compare the music to the new piece you are practicing now.
If you are ready, post a short clip of the patterns you found in your music! One of the ways we grow is through feedback and self-reflection.
Pick a piece from the suggested repertoire according to your level or share any piece written during the 18th century that you have been working on!
If you want to describe your process, feel free to use the following template.
- Piece(s) you have been working on:
- Things you found easy:
- Things you found difficult:
Happy sharing
-
I am working on trying to establish a number of sequences, which started from George Ko and his sessions on classical improvisation. I was intrigued by the comment from Antonella Di Giulio that classical composers of the 17th and 18th centuries were more akin to pop composers today than contemporary classical composers.
Therefore, I started from the basis for so many pop tunes - Pachalbel's Canon in D, which is a repeated sequence of: D maj, A maj, B min, F# min, G maj, D, maj, G maj and A maj. Each chord begins on the root, followed by a fifth, octave and third.
The first four bars have no melody. The first melody begins at bar 5 and is a descending scale from F# down to A and then back up to C#.
Bars 9 to 12 are chords in the RH: 2nd inversion, root, 2nd inversion, root, 2nd inversion, root, 2nd inversion, 2nd inversion.
This should be straightforward to memorise.
The Pachabel led me to look at Mozart's Lacrimosa [from the Requiem in D minor] - again the sequences are evident, although more complex, of course, than the Pachelbel. Working those out is a little more taxing, chords 5 - 8 set the chordal structure for the sequences.
This led to a very slow interpretation [even the Prestos] of the Fantasia in D minor K. 397/385g [I seem to be obsessed with the key of D?]
My staple piece for this community challenge is Kuhlau's Sonatina Op. 20 No 1. It's in C not D! Wow! It's possibly a little later than would be desired but he was born in 1786, so almost in the time frame.
Leann Osterkamp is such a fabuous teacher on FB. Leann has a one hour lesson on this piece, which I did. The purpose of the piece for me is do several things: learn to be able to do an Alberti bass even when the RH does something more complex on top, sequences in 3rds, double thirds, and scales, that require different fingering from the standard in places, mostly to accommodate the exits from the scale passages. Lang Lang has recorded the piece, which I shall hear when I hear after the challenge.
I chose the Kuhlau because he is known as 'the Beethoven of the flute' and I am really a flute player not a pianist. Kuhlau met and became friends with Beethoven in Vienna and promulgated Beethoven's music in Denmark.
The Doppler brothers are often associated with Kuhlau by flute players. They played fluet duets together in performance. The music was written by Franz Doppler, who was a student of Liszt. There is a story that Karl Doppler, the younger brother was left-handed and redesigned his flute so that it went in the opposite direction from his mouth from his brother's normal flute. This was done to produce a mirror image on stage when the two brothers played together, presumably facing the audience. Completely bizarre!
I am not intending to produce videos as my aim is to use sections of the above as technical exercises rather than producing a finished product.