Group 2

ENHANCE YOUR INTERPRETATIONS THROUGH HARMONIC ANALYSIS WITH BEN LAUDE

Led by tonebase Head of Piano Ben Laude, you’ll also be receiving direct feedback from two special guests: Curtis/Juilliard music theory professor and new tonebase artist Eric Wen and pianist/composer/Indiana University music faculty member and tonebase blogger Nicole DiPaolo!

This Intensive is meant for pianists of different skill levels and music theory backgrounds. If you’re new to music analysis, you’ll find all the prerequisite knowledge you’ll need and more in Ben Laude’s “Music Theory Basics” course.

Whether you’re just getting your feet wet with Roman numeral analysis, want a better grasp of figured bass, or you’re ready to ascend to the high art of Schenkerian analysis, you WILL improve your skills in music theory and analysis.

Assignments

Follow these steps:

  • Submit a piece/passage for approval! Choose a piece of tonal music whose harmony you’d like to understand better. It can be a piece you’re working on, or just one you’d enjoy. For longer works, choose a section that you’d like to focus on. 
  • Attempt a roman numeral analysis! Begin identifying harmonies and labeling them with roman numerals, either directly to your printed score or digitally using a PDF annotation app. See below for more details (1a, 1b)
  • Post your analyses to the thread for feedback! Either take a picture of your handwritten analyses or save a digitally-annotated analyses and upload into the thread below, along with any questions you might have for me, Eric, or Nicole.
  • Recommended: Let's hear how your interpretation evolves with your analysis! Post videos to show how your harmonic understanding is influencing your performance.
  • Optional: Try out formal analysis, chordal reduction, and more! If you've completed a harmonic analysis and are satisfied with it, move on to analyzing the form of your piece, attempt a chordal reduction, or explore other analytic techniques. See below for more details (2, 3, 4)

For printable staff paper, click here!

More instructions:

  • Depending on your music theory background, consider starting at either 1a or 1b and consider how far you'd like to progress beyond harmonic analysis. There's not shame in staying at 1a the whole time!! It can take a while to get the hang of this:

1a. Roman numeral analysis - Diatonic. If you’re new to music analysis, this is a good place to start. Pick a work from the classical period (Mozart, Haydn, Clementi, or Beethoven), identify the key, determine the chord scale, and begin labeling your score with Roman numerals under each distinct harmony. Look out for “non-chord tones,” notes that don’t belong to the given triad or extended chord, but live in between or next door to chord members. When you see accidentals, look for clues in the harmonic progression to help you determine if it's a passing tone/embellishment or if you're entering chromatic harmonic terrain (see 1b). Your piece might modulate, but still remain diatonic to the new key (as in simpler classical works).

1b. Roman numeral analysis - Chromatic. If you’re comfortable analyzing mostly diatonic works from the classical era, consider choosing a romantic piece that features more chromatic progressions (late Beethoven, Schubert, Chopin, Schumann, Liszt, Mendelssohn, Brahms, Grieg, Tchaikovsky). Label your score with Roman numerals, indicating modal mixture, applied chords (secondary dominants/leading tone chords), and modulations. Identify what keys you visit and keep track of how you get there.

2. (Optional) Formal analysis. If you've grasped the harmonic content of your piece/passage, you can then move on to analyzing its larger form – how phrases connect to larger sections, what key areas you visit along the way, and how the composer journeys from the tonic to the dominant and back to tonic over the course of the work. Most 18th-19th century music is in one of the following forms: binary form (A/B), ternary form (A/B/A), and sonata form (exposition/development/recapitulation). Romantic works might have more varied forms.

3. (Optional) Chordal reduction. Using voice leading principles, try constructing a chordal reduction of your piece/passage and be able to play it musically.

4. (Optional) Explore other analytic techniques. If you feel confident in your harmonic and formal analysis, consider strengthening your understanding of figured bass (thoroughbass), species counterpoint, schemas (voice leading patterns), and Schenkerian analysis.

 

RECOMMENDED TONEBASE COURSES

Primary resource

Further resources for more advanced analysis

Recommended reading

 

 

 

Group 2

Jesus Reyes

Natalie Peh

Kar

khashayar amri

Ali Bolourian

Kari

Michael

Kirsten Rielly

Jason

Annie

Michael Palmer

David Moore

Terry

Jacqueline

Kerstin

66replies Oldest first
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Active threads
  • Popular
    • Kerstin
    • Kerstin
    • 2 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi everyone! I will choose Beethoven‘s Moonlight Sonata 1. movement and a part of Chopin‘s Scherzo 2. I am working on both and have to get them in my mind. 
    Lets start. 😀

    Like
      • Kerstin
      • Kerstin
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Nicole 

      Thanks, have found the most on my own in the morning. Great. đŸŒŒ

      Like
      • Kerstin
      • Kerstin
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Ben Laude 

      Hi Ben! I was never going very deep in analyzing pieces. But if I read your comment, I see there is a lot to know and it can go veeeery deep. And the piece is great and there is still a lot on the other 2 pages. đŸ™‹â€â™€ïž

      Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Kerstin why don't we leave Beethoven alone for a moment and switch over to Chopin? Then we can come back. Nicole and I have given you a lot to chew on just on the first page! I think it's better to go deep on one section than skim the surface of a whole piece, but we can revisit this movement and look at some other spots and consider the structure of the movement too.

      Like
      • Kerstin
      • Kerstin
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Ben Laude 

      Chopin would be good. đŸŒŒ

      Like
      • Kerstin
      • Kerstin
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Kerstin 

      Hi Ben! Play the first page Beethoven today and feel the first time the cadence in bar 13, 14 to  b-minor.I have never heard this before so clearly. And I mean never. And I have found out, that 11am is in Germany 8pm. What a time difference. Have a nice weekend.đŸ™‹â€â™€ïž And thanks for the wonderful zoom-in yesterday. 

      https://youtu.be/k560VlIVQvU

      Like 1
      • Kerstin
      • Kerstin
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Nicole 
      Hi Nicloe! Can you help me with another little passage from Chopin Scherzo 2. Yesterday I was practicing and see my old labels in the middle of the score and thought, doesn’t sound minor at all. I wrote down what I think now. Is it correct? Looks like a cadence for me now.  4 bars E major, next 2 bars A major with the 6th and next 2 bars b major with the 7th somewhere in the right hand. Only this f sharp in the bass is a little crazy. Thanks for all your work. đŸ™‹â€â™€ïž
      LG Kerstin đŸŒŒ

      • Nicole
      • Nicole
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Kerstin Sure! I will be out on a church gig this morning and then teaching in the afternoon, so it may be late at night (or tomorrow morning for you) before I can really take a look--just wanted you to know that I did see the tag.

      Like
      • Nicole
      • Nicole
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Kerstin a couple quick observations:
      Measure 339, I'd call that ii7 (F#m with the E). I agree that 341 is just a decoration of the overriding dominant so I wouldn't put a new RN there. 

      334-337 are really interesting to me--they feel like a disguised "Leo" schema (which is a relative of the Romanesca, made infamous by Pachelbel's Canon). There are several YouTube videos about it if you're interested in looking into schemata, which Chopin would've known well through his work with Mr. Elsner as a kid: leo schema - YouTube

      I actually got to premiere a piece with a prominent Leo schema last fall--H. Leslie Adams' Grand March for Trumpet and Piano. I had no clue it was the premiere until I was unable to find recordings to practice with. It was a wonderful experience to meet Dr. Adams and premiere the piece!

      Like
      • Kerstin
      • Kerstin
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Nicole Thanks a lot. I will look at the youtube video. đŸ™‹â€â™€ïž

      Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Thanks Nicole !  Kerstin , to respond to your analysis of the D-flat section in the Chopin:

      • Bar 198: "I7" doesn't adequately account for the C-flat in the harmony. This is actually a "secondary dominant" chord used to momentarily tonicize a harmony other than I in D-flat. That harmony is G-flat, which you correctly label as IV in 199. So, instead of "I7" it should be labeled "V7/IV" ("Five-Seven of Four")
      • Bar 201-202: Same thing! This is a secondary dominant that leads to IV.
      • Bar 204: That's a tough chord. It's actually a BbĂž7 chord, which is functioning to prepare us for the Eb dominant 7th chord, which itself is a secondary dominant V7/V. We then land on V in 211, as you correctly labeled. Don't worry if that doesn't make sense. What matters is that you see that bar 205 is the V7 of V.
      • 213-218: Not the inversions - 213 is in 3rd inversion! Meaning, the G-flat (the 7th of the chord) is in the bass. You should write this as V4/2. Then it resolves to I in first inversion (I6). See if you can get the inversions of the subsequent chords.
      • 219-220: Again, a secondary chord, this one leading to ii - first a secondary viiÂș chord (or "secondary leading tone" chord): viiÂș/ii, and then a secondary dominant: V7/ii.
      • 222: The ii is inverted. How would you write it?
      • 223: You can't just write I here. The inversion really matters here. It's in second inversion and is preparing a cadence. That makes this the beginning of a so-called "cadential 6/4", which we discussed in our Zoom meeting. It looks like a I chord in second inversion, but the best way to understand it (and the way we hear it) is a decorated V chord, with upper neighbors falling to chord tones (in this case, D-flat falling to C and F falling to E-flat).
      • 239-248: Note the dominant pedal (A-flat in the bass with changing chords over top.
      • 242: This is actually the same chord and the same function as 219. viiÂș7/ii, but now with the pedal point.
      • The rest is right, but know that you don't need to write I repeatedly at the end: just I and a horizontal line shows what's going on better.
      Like
    • Kerstin thanks for sharing your lovely playing, Kerstin. I really like Moonlight sonata too :)

      Like
      • Kerstin
      • Kerstin
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Natalie Peh 

      Thanks. I played it also in the Masterclass with Dominic and he gave me such great advises. Wonderful. Have you ever played this Sonata? đŸŒŒ

      Like
    • Kerstin I liked it so much when I was little, that I tried to play it on my own as soon as my hands could reach an octave! 

      Like
      • Kerstin
      • Kerstin
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Natalie Peh 

      I have listened to your Mozart. Sounds nice. 👍

      Like 1
    • Kerstin thanks, Kerstin :)

      Like
    • Michael
    • mpetnuch
    • 2 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    My plan is to analyze the Schubert’s Sonata in A major, D664, third movement. Let me know if you this is inappropriate for this two weekend intensive.

    Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Michael Totally fine! I love that piece. It repeats itself and has lots of figurations, so – just harmonically speaking – you could probably make your way through the whole movement, depending on your experience level with roman numeral analysis. Do you want to try the first 18 bars? If you're comfortable with that, you could finish the A section (if you can, maybe go through first and label sections: A, B, etc).

      Like
    • Kari
    • Kari
    • 2 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    I'd like to analyze Mussorgsky's Promenade from Pictures at an Exhibition.

    Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Kari  Great choice, especially for practicing roman numeral analysis. Also, it's metrically interesting, with the changes in time signature. Why don't you start with the first phrase or two and we'll go from there?

      Like 1
    • Terry
    • Terry
    • 2 yrs ago
    • Reported - view

    I am new to analysis so, I took your suggestion and worked on Clementi Op 36 No 1.  I thought the first 5 and a half measures were straight forward.  I started having issues with measure 6 beat 4 and measure 7.  I felt that the piece modulated to G somewhere in that area and used Roman numerals for the key of G starting in measure 8.  I also had issues with the first half of measure 14.  Thanks for your time.  I've learned a lot reading your replies to everyone else.

      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Terry This is great, especially since you're new to analysis. Quick pro-tip, theorists will just write "C:" at the beginning of their analysis, and since roman numeral I is prolonged, you can just write it once and then extend a line horizontally to the right until the next harmony.

      Regarding this (I love it, by the way):

      just for your information, the general term for all of them is "non chord tone" or "NCT." Down the road when you're analyzing music, you don't actually have to circle all of them - but it's good practice for now. The first one is technically what's called an "accented passing tone," since it occurs directly on a strong beat. The Bs later in the bar are technically "neighbor tones." All the rest are "passing tones."

       

      Terry said:
      I felt that the piece modulated to G somewhere in that area

       You hit the nail on the head! So, now it's just a matter of knowing how to express the modulation with labels.

       

      First, you should look for what's called a "pivot chord." A harmony that belongs to both C and G chord scales. Here, I'd argue that the C major harmony on the downbeat of bar 6 is actually the pivot chord. You were write to label it "I" - but now, on a new line right under that, write "G:" and then IV (since C major is IV in G). Then, continuing on, your analysis from bar 8 to the end of the exposition is spot-on, except for one chord: look again at the third beat of bar 13. The notes you circled are actually chord tones! That means that IV continues through that whole bar, and the A and F-sharp are just appoggiatura-like decorations. Here's a trick: play the bar with a full c major triad in the left hand for all four beats while the right hand plays what's notated. It should sound great. Now try the same with a viiÂș6/4...

      Okay, now back to bar 7:

      I think you should label every beat with a roman numeral. Now that you know you're in G there, I think you'll be able to do it. There's something deeper to say about beats 3 and 4, and Eric Wen will discuss this, but for now just label each harmony according to the G chord scale.

      Like
      • Terry
      • Terry
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Ben Laude Thanks for the feedback. I think I made all the corrections you mentioned.  I gave 6 and 7 a try and I modified measure 14.  Your trick with playing the chord in the left against the melody worked.  My chord sounded off compared to the correct chord.

      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 2 yrs ago
      • Reported - view

      Terry Good. In bar 4, I would just call it V for the whole bar. Don't worry that a G and E are on stronger puleses than the F and D in beats 3 and 4. It's basically the continuation of that downward scale starting in the right hand - just displaced an octave lower. But if you do the trick again and play a G major chord through that measure, it's going to sound much more satisfying when it arrives back on the tonic in the next bar, with the return of the opening theme and the beginning of a new phrase.

      This is an important point, actually. You can use metrical placement as clues for what harmonies would best support melodic material. If you were to arrive at the tonic in the middle of the bar, where we feel less emphasis, there will be a far less satisfying arrival, which almost defeats the purpose of the resolution from V to I. Does that make sense? In other words, harmony and meter aren't fully independent. They work together to create different effects.

      Another little thing, and it's not even really necessary, but to account for the E on beat 4 or bar 6, you could called that a 7th chord. Try playing that harmony as a blocked chord - you'll need to add A - the 3rd above the F-sharp - which is implied in the harmony. You'll get a half-diminished chord, which is labeled viiĂž7 in G.

      But more importantly, I want you to practice this passage now with your analysis there. It really gives you a sense of the harmonic rhythm – how long a given harmony lasts with respect to the meter. It's nice to see that tonic prolonged. That can help you feel a sense of trajectory towards the V, which returns you more quickly back to I that the time it took to get there. Also, bar 7 you can now see how rapid the harmonic rhythm is relative to the rest of the passage. That's a kind of celebration of this modulation, setting up a strong cadence in G, which then rockets you up to the next sequence.

      Even if you just picked up the piece, you can keep this kind of awareness in your foreground when you're practicing, and it will help you play with more compelling phrasing, and it'll help you learn the notes faster.

      Do you want to take a swing at the next page, and we'll look at it together?

      Like
  • Hello Ben,

    I'm new to analysis, but I know chords. Is Prelude No. 2 (from twelve little preludes) from Bach a good start? I think it may be a simple one to begin with and pick a harder one if it goes well. If you agree, I can do roman numeral analysis of that piece.

    Like
    • Well, I decided to analyze and send it and see what you think. đŸ™‚

Like1 Follow
  • 1 Likes
  • 2 yrs agoLast active
  • 66Replies
  • 252Views
  • 12 Following

Home

View all topics