"Small" notes in Chopin Barcarolle

I've watched Garrick Ohlsson's lesson the Barcarolle, but I'm still confused about when to place the "small" notes at various places in the music: on the beat, or before the beat, and what about the other notes in the chord?  I think Garrick says somewhere to play the "little" notes on the beat (?), but I get confused about the other notes in the same chord.  Let me give some examples.

 

First, here's a snippet from measure 6:

Here we have a "little" e#.  Does it sound before the beat, i.e., before the other notes in the left and right hand chords?  Or is it on the beat?  If the latter, does that mean that the other right hand notes (d# and b) are delayed?  I've been playing the b and e# on the beat (i.e. together), and the d# delayed,, but I'm not sure where I got that idea and it might be wrong.

 

Here's another example from measure 20:

Same questions: is the "little" note on the beat, and how about the other right hand notes?

 

And a final example from measure 33:

 

 

My ear isn't good enough to figure this out from recordings, and my impression is the different performers do this stuff differently. 

 

(BTW, these snippets are from the Paderewski edition.)

11replies Oldest first
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Active threads
  • Popular
  • As you say, different performers do things differently.  What one would give for even a scratchy recording of Chopin playing it (or anything!) himself!

     

    The following excerpt from Josef Hofmann's book may help:  https://www.amazon.com/Piano-Playing-Questions-Answered-Dover/dp/0486233626

     

    (On the other hand, it terrifies me to claim that I've reached "that plane on which an attempt at the Barcarolle... is rational"... sigh...)

    Like
  • I'm pretty sure that Garrick talked about trills in his lesson (start them on the upper note), and there is something in the notes at the back of the Padereswki edition that says the same thing.  But I'm still confused about these non-trill ornaments.  I'll try listening to recordings at half speed; maybe that will help.

     

    In any case, I'll never be able to play the Barcarolle well enough for other people to endure the torture of listening to me, so maybe it doesn't matter.

    Like 1
    • Mark Alexander "Never" is a long time ;)

      Like
    • Jane Fleming Well, I just turned 70.  Not a lot of time left to get the Barcarolle in shape, along with the Brahms Op. 119 #4, more of the Ravel Tombeau -- the list goes on and on.

      Like
    • Mark Alexander 

      I feel your pain, old man.  I'll turn 78 in September.
      And brain fades and memory slips notwithstanding, I hacked through the Barcarolle in the recital at the Tonebase L.A. Intensive last month with total disregard for the suffering I inflicted on others.
      It's a beautiful piece, and I'm pleased when I get a few beautiful moments.
      "Don't let's ask for the moon... " 

      As for learning new pieces, yes time is definitely a constraint I also feel.  I've learned a few new pieces in the past few years.  But in the past few weeks I was starting to work on a new Rachmaninoff prelude, but then reconsidered and decided that with much less time and energy I can bring back a different Rachmaninoff prelude and a Brahms Intermezzo that I last played 15 years ago.  I'm lucky that I only work at my paying job 25-30 hours a week, but still time is limited.  And my brain is definitely mushier than once upon a time.

      Some years back, Josh Wright posted a video advising against avoiding "repertoire museums". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CH7bHgyW4Fc
      For someone his age, and no doubt for most of the students he teaches, this makes sense.  But for me at this age, anything I'm going to put the energy into trying to learn will probably be something I think is worth keeping.  But I'll still spend some time reading through pieces that I'll never wind up actually playing.

      And welcome to your 70s!

      Like 1
    • Jane Fleming  Congrats on getting a few beautiful moments in the Barcarolle.  So far the only such moment I can kinda-sorta approach is the dolce sfogato.

       

      Ah yes, Rach.  I fell in love with Lilacs after seeing Alexander Malofeev play it on YouTube.  But when I get to the last page and a half I fall apart.  Another mountain to scale!

       

      Like you, my brain is definitely mushier than it was even just 15 years ago.  Back then I was able to play a little house concert with the entire Brahms Op. 118, the Chopin D flat Nocturne, Debussy Images Bk 2 #1, Ravel Pavane, Rach C# minor Prelude.  I doubt I could pull off something like that now.

      Like
      • NANCY M
      • NANCY_A_MINDEN
      • 6 days ago
      • Reported - view

      Jane Fleming Thank you so much Jane for posting the link to the 'museum' piece. I returned to studying intensely 4 years ago, after a 50 year hiatus - I inherited the Steinway piano I had trained on, and had to make a decision. I am 73, and the work is exciting, new ( thanks to being accompanied by a brilliant teacher). I often find myself vacillating between new rep and old 'Lovers'. So I have a combination and am continuing dialogue on this with my teacher. Sometimes, I take his advice of leaning into rep, sometimes I reluctantly return to an old friend - he is patient about it. And I have found out, the hard way, the reasons leaning against and the challenges of reincarnation. It's not absolute - but there is so much wisdom in the advice.  

      Like
    • Mark Alexander 

      Your experience with the end of Lilacs, Mark, is why for the past 20 years I've made it a practice to begin any new piece (including the Barcarolle) at the end of the last page, then learn my way backwards from there.
      Benefits include:

      • If the end is too hard for me to learn, I can re-evaluate whether I want to just work on easier sections of the piece or to drop it altogether.
      • When I play the piece after it's learned, I get more confident rather than less as I play through the pages from beginning to end.

      Your house concert is impressive, much more than I could ever have pulled off.  For that matter, the recitals at the L.A. Tonebase Intensive and at last summer's Tonebase "piano camp" were the first times I'd played for more than 3 people since about 1960.

      I understand (and obviously share) the passion to learn to play the Barcarolle.  But you're lucky also to have a range of beautiful pieces you can bring back much more easily than learning new ones.
      If you haven't read it, you might enjoy Charles Cooke's "Playing the Piano for Pleasure", with a lot of suggestions for those of us who will be forever amateurs. https://www.amazon.com/dp/1616082305

      Cheers!

      Like
    • NANCY M 

      How lucky you are to have a brilliant teacher, Nancy!  And a beautiful piano.
      Other than a handful of lessons at the two Tonebase events I've attended, I haven't had a teacher since 1963.  And one of my top motivations for attending both of those events was to be able to take a break from my electronic piano with headphones and to play on acoustic instrument for a change.

      I'm not sure I understand what you're saying about your reaction to the 'museum pieces' video - are you finding your "reluctant" return to an old friend seems like a mistake or the other way around?  It's obviously a personal matter, and one's feelings about it may certainly ebb and flow over time.
      I've only learned five "from scratch new" pieces since I've been in my 70s, by what I tried to count today.  But I've re-learned several from decades past, and play them better now than I did then.
      I mentioned earlier in this thread that last week I was starting to read through a Rachmaninoff prelude I've never played but have for now decided to resurrect two different pieces instead.  And I'm seriously tempted to re-learn Beethoven's Op. 111, that I had memorized 30-plus years ago.  Maybe I'm old enough to play it now ;)  

      We each have our unknown allotted time and our known energies and resources to allocate as best seems fit.  It sounds as if you're an attentive observer of yours, and I'm sure you'll enjoy and find satisfaction in the process.

      Best wishes!

      Like
      • NANCY M
      • NANCY_A_MINDEN
      • 5 days ago
      • Reported - view

      Jane Fleming Thank you for your thoughtful reply. I appreciate the connection.  Your confusion  to my comment about returning to old friends and lovers is valid - as it's not dichotomous - it's ambivalent  and has pros and cons, like most everything. I don't have full clarity on which is the right way to go because I'm too in the thick of preparing pieces- some are new, some are my dinosaurs, for sharing with others in informal classes. I trust my teacher, and although he leans towards suggesting I study 'new', he has accepted and is intensely supporting my work on the old. So I'm doing both. As with so much intense learning, I won't really know if I've made the right choices in doing both until its behind me. In the meantime, my focus is to enjoy the challenges of learning in the present, build new capabilities and revive old ones, and to refocus my somewhat neurotic anxieties  and impatience with my current capacity. It's about the music. 

      Like 1
    • Jane Fleming The strategy of starting at the end of the piece and working backwards is how I've worked on the Barcarolle.  But when I finally got to the first two pages, I found they were nearly as hard as the end, especially measures 20, 21, 23, and 24. I've also been using this strategy on Lilacs, though I had to stop working on it because the Barcarolle was taking too much of my energy.

      Like 1
Like Follow
  • 5 days agoLast active
  • 11Replies
  • 46Views
  • 3 Following

Home

View all topics