Group 2

 

Welcome to the latest TWO WEEK INTENSIVE on tonebase!

For the next two weeks we will be working through assignments given by Ben Laude to improve your playing and understanding of Schubert!

Pianists of all levels are welcome. 

More Detailed instructions coming soon!

  • Sign-Up : December 1st - 4th
  • Course Period: December 4th -15th
  • Class Size: ALL are welcome!
  • Optional check-In via Zoom: December 12th at 11am PT

Click here to join the meeting!

 

Assignment #1

 

ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS (WEEK 1)

 

VIDEO ASSIGNMENT

 

  1. Watch the ABOVE video, which will serve as a crash course in chromatic harmony in preparation for your assignment.
  2. Perform a harmonic analysis on Schubert’s Moment Musical #6 (A Section only; you can stop at the Trio):
    • Label chords with roman numerals
    • Mark cadences (half cadence: ends on V; authentic cadence: V resolves to I)
    • Identify the following chromatic devices:
      • Secondary dominant
      • Augmented 6th
      • Modal mixture
      • Chromatic mediant
      • Common-tone modulation
  3. Optional: Perform a harmonic analysis on a Schubert piece of your choice (or target specific passages from pieces you’re curious about)

 

→ Don’t expect to get everything right! This is an advanced harmonic analysis. The whole point of the TWI is to dive into the deep end of Schubert’s harmony and form


→ Ask questions in the forum! I will be replying to user questions, and we’ll be going over the whole thing in next week’s Zoom meeting.

→ For more experienced users, I do recommend analyzing the recommended study piece (and helping your fellow TWIs); but you may want to spend your time on another Schubert piece you’re already working on.

Schubert’s piano music

  • The “easiest” of Schubert’s piano music are probably his collections of Waltzes, LĂ€ndler, and other dances. These capture the spirit of Schubert the dancer, although they aren’t representative of his harmonic/compositional exploration, so I don’t recommend them for this TWI. Instead, you should take a look through Schubert's core piano repertoire, most of which is listed here:

    Level 6-8

    • Moment musicals
    • Two Scherzi, D. 593
    • Impromptus op 90, op 142
    • 3 Klavierstucke

    Level 6-10

    • Sonatas

    Level 11

    • Wanderer Fantasy
  • Feel free to venture beyond the solo piano music!

ZOOM CHECK- IN with Ben!

https://youtu.be/96KZeuy9MpM

39replies Oldest first
  • Oldest first
  • Newest first
  • Active threads
  • Popular
  • Silly question. Once I’m Brazilian I’m really curious of what TWI stands for in our context of piano classes! Could you clarify to me?

    Like 1
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi Eder Giaretta  - It stands for "Two-Week Intensive"

      Like 1
    • Ben Laude
    • Head of Piano @ tonebase
    • Ben_Laude
    • 11 mths ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi everyone! Excited to explore Schubert with you these next couple weeks. Let me know what questions you have.

    Like 1
  • HI everyone!  Thank you for this course.  I am excited to be doing this, and learning more about Harmonic analysis.  My understanding is very basic for this, so I will be doing a lot of learning 😳.  And I'm a bit intimidated by it, but do look forward to being challenged.

    One question:  When I clicked on what look like a link for Schubert's Moment Musical #6, it says the page is unavailable.  I'm wondering if that will be available?  I do have a VERY old copy (it says copyright 1897 😳), and parts of it are not easily readable.  thanks so much!

    Like 1
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi Jennifer Mehta ! We're working to get that link fixed for everyone. Meanwhile here it is:Schubert MM 6 

      Yes harmony can be intimidating, especially when it gets chromatic and you're wondering why there are so many accidentals all over the page... but I'm here to help and don't be afraid to ask questions no matter how basic. Once you get the hang of it, you'll realize it's all very logical - and understanding it better can be very enlightening to the whole musical experience!

      Like 1
    • Ben Laude Thank you so very much!!!!!!

      Like 1
    • Mari Adams
    • Mari_Adams
    • 11 mths ago
    • Reported - view

    Hello, I am a new member and have only recently returned to piano after having laid my major instrument, viola, aside due to torn rotator cuffs. My piano training was quite brief but I have been muddling through the hauntingly beautiful Schubert 960 with the help of two conservatory graduates, my son from the RCM Toronto and the San Francisco CM and my grandson from the RCM (Royal College of Music) and Juilliard.This piece has strong associations for me but as my technical training is weak on piano, I am struggling. I would be interested in references during the course to various approaches with trills, pedalling and repeated notes that tend to become staccato instead of slurred as in measures 165—. The history of this period of Schubert’s life, during which he wrote these great works while wracked with both pain and sorrow, will help me relate to this piece, as the music varies so abruptly between light and darkness. I look forward to your encouraging and enlightening presentations. Thank you.

    Like 1
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Mari Adams Thank you for sharing! And always happy to work on mechanical things - and also supply references to other tonebase videos where issues are addressed more directly.

       

      Sounds like you might be losing control in the RH during the repeated notes/intervals happening around m165? I wonder if this happens when you're playing the right hand alone, in which case you might be over-straining on the repetitions due to the left hand's mounting activity. Even hands alone, though, that kind of repeated note passage in Schubert can be difficult to keep from sounding too "pecky", and ultimately the solution has to do with being able to sit your weight in your finger, staying close to the key, and play more from the upper arm and not at all from the wrist/finger. Then it should just feel like you're very quickly picking up and dropping your weight through the finger, staying balanced. Then it helps to feel a bit of a "down / up" on every pair of repeated notes.

       

      But I'm speculating! And we're just getting started. But let me know if that makes any sense or helps.

      Like 1
      • Mari Adams
      • Mari_Adams
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Ben Laude Thank you, Ben. That does indeed make sense and is precisely what my ‘mentors’ are demonstrating. It is those pesky two eights slurred followed by a repeat of the last 8th in the LH that need some ironing. By the way, when I joined two weeks ago, I headed straight for a video lesson on the 960 but to no avail. Would it be possible to augment your collection with this piece?

      Like 1
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Mari Adams Regarding creating a D. 960 lesson, I'll refer you to Dominic Cheli  . I'm not sure it's viable for us to produce a full premium lesson on it in the near future, but at the very least I'll offer more specific thoughts on it these next couple weeks (I've chosen it as my Schubert piece for this intensive) and there could potentially be a livestream on it in the near future as well.

       

      I think I understand what you mean here:

      It is those pesky two eights slurred followed by a repeat of the last 8th in the LH that need some ironing

       

      So you're actually talking about the left hand, not the right?

      Actually the things I wrote about the right hand still apply here, but obviously I'd have to see you try it before I can give more specific advice/ practice tips. If the issue is starting the next 2-note slur, which repeats the note that came before it, the goal is for it not even to feel like you're repeating a note. The second note under each slur requires a slight lifting movement, while still "standing" on the key so you don't drop the note (just, with less weight), then – in standard 2-note slur form – you bring the weight back down on to the "repeated" A-flat, which is the first note of the next 2-note slur. This should technically feel the same as if you were playing a new note (say, G), rather than repeating the A-flat.

      Try this for now (and then I'll back off... don't want to get too lost in the weeds this early, but this might help):

      Play left hand alone and hold the first note of each two note slur for a quarter-note duration. While you're holding it, really feel like you're "standing on the key" with your finger... your weight grounded in the tip/pad. Now, keeping that weight in place, slightly move your forearm forward and to the left and "touch" the second not of the 2-note slur, but then release. After playing each 2-note group like this, lift the whole hand and drop onto the next 2-note slur and repeat the exercise.

      The point here is to make it feel like there is no repeated note, but rather: a series of down motions, planting on the first of each 2-note group, which will create a scale (Bb - Ab - G - F, etc), with an incidental second note grabbed next to each along the way down. It just so happens that you'll end up "repeating" that note, but physically it shouldn't feel that a note was repeated.

      Like 1
      • Lc
      • lc_piano
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Ben Laude What a brilliant way to describe the weight transfer of slurred notes.

      And yes, please do a live stream on D960! 

      Like 1
  • Hi Everyone

     

    I am new to tonebase (though I have been Watchung the YouTube videos with great delight for the past few years). I signed up for the trial period and Marina Lomazov's course alone has already sealed for me (IE I am keeping my subscription!) Not to mention the Penelope Roskell videos which are pure gold!

     

    I am a pianist and music theory teacher in Canada, working very hard to attract more students so that I keep at this forever. I will save the long story of my journey, but I am very interested in doing a Schubert deep dive. He has long been a favorite, bur not a composer I had worked on personally very much. That being said, my first pandemic piece (newly started in April 2020) was a Schubert Sonata - the A major D. 664 or op. 120. It has been fascinating working on Schubert because the way he writes is so different from the other great Sonata composers! At any rate, I haven't touched the Sonata in awhile, but I did have the 1st movement at performance level, I have performed the second movement (not to my satisfaction ... but still) and worked on about half of the third movement. I would like to be able to do with Schubert what I am capable of doing with Beethoven - finding the connections and being able to see large and small scale items. 

    I do teach music theory but mostly at an intermediate level. I would describe my knowledge as Adequate and workable but not all encompassing and some of the items on the list here are areas where I would like to improve (identifying modal mixture, common tone modulation etc). So if you are really stuck on theory basics, I may be of some assistance 😉.

     

    Excited to move forward with this as a side project which will hopefully lead towards me performing the full Sonata with real insight (and learning and performing more of them! Love all the Sonatas that I am familiar with from this one to the final 3).

     

    If you made it this far, thanks for reading. :) Good luck on your exploration!

    Like 1
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi John Denton - thanks for sharing and so glad you're enjoying the platform so far. If you haven't found it yet, we do have a lesson on D. 664 by Andrew Tyson (link here). One of the earliest courses I filmed, so there's no overhead angle, but I can't recommend Andrew more highly in terms of his sound and ideas throughout the lesson.

      Like 1
    • Ben Laude Hi Ben - I've been a little busier this past week than I had anticipated but I did find the time to watch Andrew's video series based on your recommendation. Thank you for the suggestion! I must say that I had my reservations initially as I believed I knew my way around D.664. I was very pleased out of the gate as Andrew touched on so many things that I had worked out - it was good to know that I was on the right track. But then he went in depth and touched on so many ideas that hadn't even occurred to me. I found his insights to be thorough yet organic and really related specifically to this Sonata. I've been so impressed with all of the tonebase content so far. Thank you 

       

      I am hoping to have a bit more time in the week ahead. I am actually thinking of spending some of my Schubert time on Winterreise. I love Schubert's piano music dearly but I have started to discover his lieder during the pandemic - I will see what I come up with! Looking forward to getting the hang of the TWI a little more 😀

      Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      John Denton I'm glad you found the Andrew Tyson lesson! I love how the piano sounds (and how he makes it sound) in that lesson. One of the most underrated videos on tonebase!

      I encourage you to do some work on Wintereisse. Yes, please! Feel free to share your thoughts/analysis about any given piece from it.

      Like
    • Lc
    • lc_piano
    • 11 mths ago
    • Reported - view

    Hello everyone,

     

    Looking forward to be part of this TWI.  I was just thinking back to the last TWI challenge I participated -  coincidentally, on Harmonic Analysis with Ben Laude . It was so fruitful , thank you Ben!! It changed the way I played the Beethoven op110 3rd movement. I could picked it up so much easier again.

     

    Much as I wish I could report that I do harmonic analysis for all the pieces I play since the last challenge, sadly, I confess I'm too lazy. (I tried page one of Debussy Reflets dan l'eau and gave up after a day of pulling hair counting up to 13th, or is it 15th chord).  

     

    Anyway, looking forward to another TWI on Schubert, deadlines helps. Very fun to hear Mari Adams  discussion on 960.    This past year, I studied/memorized and performed D.960 (2nd time studying this sonata).  2nd movement is still unsatisfactory to me. Anyway, I'll try to analyze D960 and hopefully this piece could be kept up more easily. 

     

     If I have time, I'll try to look into analyzing Wanderer Fantasy - a dream piece.  But I'm nowhere there to play it yet, but hopefully one step closer if I could analyze it.

     

    Good having everyone in this group!

     

    p/s: I'm a total amateur, but lucky enough to be learning piano full time. 

    Like 1
  • Well, I’ve worked through some key parts of the music theory basics course and watched the video.  I’ve started with the first line, I think I’m getting a little understanding of this now.  At first I found it very hard, but it is starting to make sense,  I’ll check out the other resources for more learning.  What I am seeing is that when I play any piece, I am starting to hear it differently, and going, “Oh, that’s how that is structured“.  So, I think that is good.  To me this seems similar to learning grammar for a foreign language I initially learned by speaking.  I have had some basic understanding of the theory, but now I am adding all the grammar rules.  Not a perfect analogy, but that’s what this seems like.  I do have questions, and once I figure out how to ask them, I will, haha.  Thank you for this challenging course.

    Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Jennifer Mehta I think it's a good analogy. I would add vocabulary too (meaning a kind of "harmonic vocabulary", not the terms we happen to give to chords). And - while people might mock studying grammar ("because what matters is how well you speak a language!"), the truth is, any great writer or prose stylist has a deep/conscious understanding of grammar and of course an always-expanding vocabulary. Suddenly the possibilities of writing open up and it feels like you can express anything you want, even brand new ideas. Not a perfect parallel here, since we're not composing music (maybe it's more akin to how your ease with reading and interpreting great literature can develop through the study of grammar/vocab), but nevertheless, developing our analytic skills so that we can glance at a Schubert piece and know within a minute the detailed structure of all the compositional decisions he made is enormously helpful to the practicing musician. But you have to put that knowledge to work, and not let it remain abstract from the process of music making. It should (1) allow you to memorize music 10x faster, and 10x more securely (this alone should persuade the music theory-detractors out there among pianists I know); but even more (2) when you're informed and listening to all the elements of harmony and phrase structure, suddenly opens up a world of possibilities in terms of voicing and interpretation.

      Like 1
    • Ben Laude I can also see some other usefulness of this.  When I play for worship services, I am sometimes asked to modulate between songs.  Right now I painstakingly figure out something that makes sense between the two pieces.  This will really help me understand how modulations happen, and the "grammar" of them and it should become much easier.  I can also see that it will make transposing something much easier as I learn to think of the Roman numerals for the chord structure of pieces.  That would be much easier than trying to mentally transform it from the written key to any other key.  The Roman numeral chords would translate much easier.  This will really take my understanding, thoughts, and interpretation of music to a whole other level!  Wow!

      Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Jennifer Mehta Absolutely. In the old days, pianists would sometimes play a chord progression in between pieces to modulate from the even of the previous tonality to the new one. Schubert shows us how, even between the most remote tonalities, it only takes a couple chords to get there smoothly!

      Like
  • If time allows, Ben, could you go through the impromptu op142 No.3 particularly the last 3 variations 3,4, 5 they are technically demanding for me,how to approach it. No 3 requires a quiet left hand without loosing your position all over the place.I don’t have as much trouble with this as 4and 5. I am sorry I am late in my request, I had a very bad fall and is recovering. Also it would be nice if you could go through the 4 hands fantasy in c at another class in the future. Thank you

    Priscilla

    Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      priscillayam First, I hope you're okay and recovering quickly!

      Let me offer a little bit of advice here, and then I'll see if I have time to make a video about this. I actually played this piece on a doctoral recital at Juilliard (after hearing Horowitz's performance of it in his famous Moscow recital).

      In the third variation, practice the left hand alone as follows: slowly play the moving line in the thumb and second finger legato while playing the lower voices staccato. Go as slowly as you need to. This will help you develop finger independence so eventually you'll feel the hand come down on the keys with different levels of pressure, and suddenly you should feel in more control. Stay close to the keys and just focus on tipping your weight a little towards that moving voice while the repeated voices feel a little squishier (but still balanced). Later on, other voices will move, not just the thumb-side, and you'll need to accommodate in that direction.

      Let me know what your issues are in #4. I always found this one pretty comfortable, especially because G-flat feels nice under the hands. The trouble might be that the left hand carries the tune, and there's some wide-ish spans. Don't ever try to cover the wide intervals (10ths, 11ths) all at once – instead, move the wrist laterally to stay behind the smaller intervals that make up the larger ones.

      The 5th variation is challenging with all those moving 16th triplets, but I wouldn't focus on the right hand as much as the left. You need to make sure you preserve the dance in the left, so get really good at playing hands alone there and then add the right hand, which should just feel like it's falling into place. The B section, where the hands switch roles, is tricky. Focus on mastering smaller groups of notes in the LH runs, and also aim at certain notes (like, when it's zigzagging down in the g minor, you have the pillar notes of the Gm triad to use as anchors).

      Like 1
    • Ben Laude Hello Ben, 

      You mad me feel a lot better already knowing this is worthy of part of your doctorate!

      I  tried you suggestions at the piano just now, and your suggestions will really help me. Thank you so much for taking the time to respond. This will help me more than you can imagine.  Priscilla.

      Like
    • Gloria
    • Gloria
    • 11 mths ago
    • Reported - view

    Hi Ben, 

    I am a new member and I am really excited to learn more advanced techniques  and expend my repertoires. 
    analysis is not my favourite subject even though I learned from it long time ago in my university.  
    I watched your video and try to analyze #6 by Schubert but not  enough time to complete the task. 

    I can hear the different colour of the chords but having a difficult time to figure it out. 
    I will try to summit my analysis later. 
    thank you. 
    Gloria

    Like
      • Ben Laude
      • Head of Piano @ tonebase
      • Ben_Laude
      • 11 mths ago
      • Reported - view

      Hi Gloria - I recommend limiting your analysis to a shorter passage in the Schubert, maybe one that you're particularly curious about. I'm less interested in seeing a full page of labels, than your effort in a single passage where you try to make sense out of an unusual series of harmonies.

      In any case, you're on the right track if you're listening and noticing the particular colors of each chord. As I say in my video below: it's possible to just have ears, and develop them to be very sensitive, without ever knowing any music theory terms. I still think it's useful to give these chords names, however, and I hope I can at least help you draw your attention to what note(s) in a given chord are the ones giving it a special color. Once you're hearing chord color and noticing the notes that make them colorful, the next step is to look at the chords around them and ask "okay, where is this music going, what is it doing?" In other words, the bigger goal is to develop an awareness of how chords function in larger phrases. Let me know if there's a particular phrase where I can help you achieve this.

      Like
Like3 Follow
  • 3 Likes
  • 11 mths agoLast active
  • 39Replies
  • 250Views
  • 10 Following

Home

View all topics