Schubert!

Whether you are currently playing Schubert, listening to Schubert, or just discovering Schubert's vast catalog, this is the thread for sharing any thoughts, observations, questions, favorite recordings, or anything else. 

I also hope to discuss:

  • Theory
  • Specific pieces
  • Technique and interpretation
  • Liszt transcriptions
  • Anything else!

Performances are welcome as well!

To start, which of his Sonatas is your favorite?

Do you prefer the Impromptus or Moments Musicaux? Which set of Impromptus do you prefer?

 

 

87 replies

null
    • Winterreise
    • Thierrynk
    • 4 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Hello 

    For some unknown reason my previous post has been « pending review » for 5 days even after mail to support. I was not allowed new answers anywhere and even « likes ». 
     

    I will try to catch up because there are so interesting new posts. 
     

    Kind regards

    Thierry

      • Der Wanderer
      • FRANZ_SCHUBERT
      • 3 days ago
      • Reported - view
       said:
      As they are a lot of “images” in his lieder, I asked her if I could imagine images for this andantino (that is in fact Andante, slower!! if you look at the manuscript).
      She told me YES, OF COURSE, TO BUILD HOW YOU WANT TO PLAY, BUT THEN YOU MUST FULLY FORGET THESE IMAGES WHEN YOU ACTUALLY PLAY.

      Thierry, I am fascinated with how you think about music and the connection to imagery is one that I can relate to.  Everything I play is informed by imagery in my mind and this guides my interpretation every step of the way.  I have never literally created images (with my own camera) or found actual photos / images to represent my feelings in connection to the music.  It is like creating a gallery created for viewing art made specifically for some music.  The visual realm needs the aural world to be more complete.  

      What I do not understand (yet) is your mentor telling you "to fully forget these images when you actually play."   What could be the reason?  Everything we play from any composer is an interpretation after-all.  What do you replace these images with?

       said:
      For this andantino/andante, a first image came to me. But it was NOT suited to the middle section that represents for me the absolute chaos and the disappearance of any humanity.

       Yes, this Andantino from D 959 alone is a masterpiece.  I do not think I could ever find enough words in the world to describe it.  The beautiful bleakness contrasted with the confounding chaos.

      This is an example of why I need Schubert.  

      • Winterreise
      • Thierrynk
      • 3 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Images are useful to DECIDE harmonization, tempi, rubato, phrasing etc. And I process often by fail/retry. I often record myself while working. 

      When you play, you become the conductor, you need anticipation for a lot of things, you have to adapt to a new piano when you do not play at home, you need to tune the pedal in real time according to the acoustics and the size of the room. And you have to listen to what you are playing. 

      if you add images, you may be submerged by your own emotions. 

      I chose images that are in support to my own emotions produced by the music. But, then, my goal is to transmit emotions to the listener, emotions that are not mine and that can be very different from mine. 
       

      As said Bernstein: when you love something, give it away. 
       

      I see this as a multi layer cake: the score, the composer history, harmony, phrasing, dynamics, etc, my own feelings, images to support them. 
      The risk of destroying the basic fundamental layers by having the mind occupied by the last ones is huge. 
       

      Kind regards

      • Der Wanderer
      • FRANZ_SCHUBERT
      • 3 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Well said!

    • Peter_William
    • 3 days ago
    • Reported - view

     Kudos! for starting this thread.  What a profound discussion! So many insights into Schubert.

    • Der Wanderer
    • FRANZ_SCHUBERT
    • 3 days ago
    • Reported - view

    Case Study #1267:  More reasons why Schubert is mandatory and necessary to me.

    The G-major Sonata, D 894 is a long work.  Even more so if you are committed to playing it at a slower tempo which it deserves.

    Of course there are many highlights but here is one reason that causes me to spend 40 years in the wilderness possibly wondering around looking for the promised land.  After a lot of ground covered (meandering for 45 minutes maybe?) you come to this (see attachment).

    Blink and you might miss it.  A few short bars but within them is what I come to Schubert for.  A complete representation of the actual definition of what bittersweet means (arousing pleasure tinged with sadness or pain).

    This is only one reason out of thousands of why I need Schubert.  These are priceless gifts to those who find them.

    I ask then, what kind of goblin or monster could you be if you can play this and not be truly moved beyond words? (<-- another example of how music has the ability to make me overly passionate and probably a very unreasonable, insufferable soul ;-).    (I'm joking, of course!)

    The last thing I would like to say is that like no other composer (in my mind) when Schubert tells you its Pianissimo or even Pianississimo take note.  These are usually his most special moments and he is imploring you to come closer (to him).  He is going to whisper a secret to you in your ear.  It is so special that no one else should hear this.  It is only for you...

      • Winterreise
      • Thierrynk
      • 3 days ago
      • Reported - view

      ❤️❤️❤️

    • Winterreise
    • Thierrynk
    • Yesterday
    • Reported - view

    Hello

    On Instagram, I follow Daniel Anastasio. 

    Here are 2 of his comments that I find so right and useful. 
     

    - About Klavierstucke 2 D946

    You have to TRUST Schubert, and not try to add many things to the simplicity of his melodies or his so long phrases  

     

    - About D960 first movement and its scary bass trills just after a peaceful melody.

    Love turns into pain but pain turns into love.

    In Schubert’s music love and despair are constantly flowing into each other, each giving meaning to each other.

    Beauty gives the darkness more heartache, and the darkness gives beauty more profundity. 

      • Der Wanderer
      • FRANZ_SCHUBERT
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       Yes !!!  I couldn't agree more with this.  The sentiment is correct but I would choose different words.  Words that still fall short but are closer to me.

      I don't connect him with love and despair.  I think Schubert walks the line masterfully of hope and melancholy.  It is an impossible oxymoron like joyful sorrow, happy sadness or tears of joy?

      • Larry_K
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       Daniel is great. Could you post the link to the Schubert video you referred to? 

      • Winterreise
      • Thierrynk
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       

      This comes from Schubert himself. 

      Mein Traum

      "For many years, I felt torn between the greatest pain and the greatest love... Every time I tried to sing love, it turned into pain. And likewise, when I tried to sing pain, it turned into love. This is how love and pain were shared in me. ”

      • Akzent oder Diminuendo?
      • Maria_F
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       Sensucht? Wehmut? Freudentränen?

      • Peter_William
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       OMG!. I have been following Daniel Anastasio. I found him to be an absolutely wonderful explainer and pianist while he is playing !.. Don't be too surprised ! (He is a Julliard alum! I think .. :-)). That channel should have min. 500k subscribers!.. 

      • Der Wanderer
      • FRANZ_SCHUBERT
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       Yes, I do not disagree.  I was simply trying to expand the idea; the sense of contrast.  

      In addition, I find that with most composers tend to contrast side by side - first one emotion followed by the contrasting emotion.   With Schubert, for me anyway, I find that the music somehow delivers a unified dichotomy like no one else?  These two opposing feelings have been blended and you can't experience one without the other concurrently.

      The opening to your Andantino from D959 sonata or my G-major Sonata, D 894 example above are good examples out of the hundreds of examples of this.  The middle section of the Andantino is clearly only despair.

      Also, I find that Schubert is the only composer that makes a work in a major key feel like it is in a minor key?  This is why these major key Sonatas appeal to me so much.  

      PS:  I think your blocked post has appeared above as I just realized you have a post now from earlier that I don't recall reading before.  You say everything I think but you do say it more succinctly and much better of course!

      • Winterreise
      • Thierrynk
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       

      I do not disagree with you!!

      Each one of us use the words that seem more appropriate to each one.

      I also have hope and melancholy in mind. 

      The words from Schubert himself provide some “hints”. This is why I posted them. 
       

      It seems that we have the same fascination and love for Schubert, and finally we agree on everything!!

       

      My blocked post was the one starting by “Good morning (I live in France and English is not my language).”

      • Peter_William
      • 8 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

      @Thierry NK

       If it were "My blocked post was the one starting by “Good morning (I live in France and English is not my "first and only" language).”  It would have passed through the censor's gates. lol! Just a side remark for attempted light humor.

      But I shall be silent promptly - as this thread is absolutely fascinating to read from a musical understanding point of view.  

      • Winterreise
      • Thierrynk
      • 7 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

       

      😂👍

      • Akzent oder Diminuendo?
      • Maria_F
      • 5 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

        ???

    • Der Wanderer
    • FRANZ_SCHUBERT
    • Yesterday
    • Reported - view

    This is from the post above I either missed or it just appeared lately after being withheld:

     said:
    Minor-major transition are more tragic than minor itself.

    Not sure if I agree with this.  For example, personally, in my example above of the few bars from the G-major Sonata, D 894 I specifically only highlighted the "minor" view.  I had intended to but didn't talk about my disappointment with Schubert that several lines later he resolves this exact section into a major key.  Yes, I suppose he is offering us some glimmer of hope but I find this transition has a negative affect on me.  

    This is specifically my view.  I prefer the minor keys, period with Schubert being one of the best exceptions.  I like Florestan (+) but I really prefer Eusebius (-).  I simply find that more interesting, emotional, complex matters happen only in minor keys (generally) and the stories told are always better through them.

      • Der Wanderer
      • FRANZ_SCHUBERT
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       Oops ^^^. Despite this I do think we still agree on everything ;-)

      • Winterreise
      • Thierrynk
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       

      We enter a quite complex discussion because of the writing format and my not native English language. 

      I should have written “often” about minor-major transitions but I gave the example of C minor impromptu. 

      We enter the universe of interpretation.

      Do I see this or that major passage as sunny and happy, or do I feel and want to show a happiness memory or wish? Is it real or a dream?

      The use of major/minor keys by Schubert can be quite disappointing. 
       

      Erlkonig

      Story teller: minor

      Father: major when he tries to comfort his son. For me “false” and “lie” major. Minor when he is worried. 

      Son: minor, terror

      Erlkonig: always major, perversion, incest, death. 

      I not pretend anything general and always true.

      I just think that Schubert is so difficult to play, not because of length or technique, but because of ambiguity everywhere. 

      • Der Wanderer
      • FRANZ_SCHUBERT
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       These are excellent observations!  I love your example of the Erlkönig.  This is something I need to think about more.  I agree with everything you said.

      Of course, if you allow me to jest a little, my first thoughts were, "See, major keys rightly represent the deceptive and dubious characters.  Even more reason for me to avoid them ;-)

      • Winterreise
      • Thierrynk
      • Yesterday
      • Reported - view

       

      For me, it is not jest!! And I feel like you!!

      Listen to Richter D960 first movement.

      He is one of the rare pianist to respect the molto moderato indication.

      With his phrasing/breath, is the major theme so « major? Is the bass trill so surprising? And does the silence after seem to last an eternity?
       

      https://youtu.be/lncNcNtGkJY?is=rA4gwwoKD0tC7XzV

      • hot4euterpe
      • 23 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

       

      Erlkonig

      Story teller: minor

      Father: major when he tries to comfort his son. For me “false” and “lie” major. Minor when he is worried. 

      Son: minor, terror

      Erlkonig: always major, p-------n, i----t, death. 

      While I agree that Schubert uses major and minor tonalities in nuanced ways, this reading of the Erlkönig is a bit atypical (though you have mentioned a language barrier so perhaps that is the cause). The father is not lying to his son, he is reassuring his son of what he perceives to be childish fears. The major key represents the calm and comfort he is earnestly trying to give to his son (as virtually all parents have had to do!). There is a tragic irony here in that the listener knows that they are in fact in danger. The anguish that the father feels at the end is felt doubly because we know it is coming and yet we are forced to still witness the horrible moment - a moment when he leaves the major key of his misguided assurances and confronts the reality of his error and his loss.  

      Additionally, the use of major key for the Erlkönig does not signify what you suggested. It signifies the promise of safety and merriment that the Erlkönig is attempting to use as a lure for the son. It is clearly a transparent deception because the son only becomes more fearful from it as they recognize it as a false goodness. The Erlkönig tries to 'wear a cloak of major' to conceal what he represents but it fits him poorly.

      Schubert certainly uses key, harmonic devices and texture to signal subverted meaning behind the text but I don't think he is using major or minor unusually in this particular work. He is in fact using them stereotypically and it is up to the listener to recognize the irony.

       

      Edit: This was initially marked pending review... but I got it to go through with some editing of flagged words!

      • Winterreise
      • Thierrynk
      • 22 hrs ago
      • Reported - view

       

      It becomes quite tough for me to answer and the subject itself may be beyond the scope of this forum. 
       

      Nevertheless, I will say a few things and everyone will be then be free to connect the dots. 
       

      Text is of first importance for Schubert.
       

      Lie is not the right term for the father.  Denial is the right one. 
       

      At that time and for ever, children words were not listened to and are still now not listened to. Father’s denial is the norm. 
       

      Maybe, there are only 3 characters in Goethe’s poem, including the story teller.

Content aside

  • 7 Likes
  • 9 min agoLast active
  • 87Replies
  • 331Views
  • 15 Following