Week 2: Your First Check-in

 

You’ve chosen your Liszt piece. Now the adventure really begins.

 

This week is all about getting inside the music without worrying about perfection yet. Liszt’s music can feel grand, poetic, dramatic, intimate, or completely overwhelming, sometimes all within the same page.

 

For this week, we’d love for you to share:

  • Early practice clips
  • First impressions of your piece
  • Passages you’re struggling with
  • Musical moments you already love
  • Questions or discoveries from practice
  • How Liszt feels under your hands so far

A few ideas to focus on this week:

  • Finding a comfortable starting tempo
  • Practicing smaller sections instead of full run-throughs
  • Looking for patterns in the texture
  • Identifying one or two “problem spots”
  • Finding the main melody inside thick textures

Whether you’re working on a Consolation, a transcription, a Hungarian Rhapsody, a piece from Years of Pilgrimage, or a short excerpt from a larger work, we’re excited to hear your first steps into Liszt’s world.

Looking forward to seeing what everyone is discovering this week!

119 replies

null
    • Pediatrician
    • a_weymann
    • 8 days ago
    • Reported - view

    I had intended to post a practice video illustrating my current status of Vision, but I've had a very full day, musically speaking (a 1.5-hour voice lesson, a 2-hour piano lesson, and 2-3 hours of practicing), plus rounding at the hospital in the morning and being on call all day, so you'll forgive me if I say: I just can't. Not tonight. However: I can share some insights. First of all, the beginning of the piece is harder than I had anticipated since my piano teacher disabused me of the notion that some of the 32nd note figures in the first 12 measures can be played with the right hand. They cannot (must not)! Much of the first half of this etude is intended to train the left hand. This makes for some very awkward leaps indeed. Oh, well. The other problem are the very wide arpeggi in the right hand: I mostly get them, except for the top notes. Even for my fairly large hands, those are difficult to reach with the pinky. More wrist flexibility and forearm movement will be needed here. "La souplesse avant tout!", to quote the Master. Then the choreography of it all: one is constantly tempted to just pay attention to whichever hand is the busiest in that moment (in other words, whichever hand plays the fast arpeggio) and not remember that in the meantime, the other hand needs to get where it needs to be by the next beat. To make those alternating movements fluid and evenly "swinging" takes some work. Finally, my section of the piece ends in an octave passage; it's not particularly hard, but it needs to be brought into a Lisztian tempo, with the proper bravura sound. So, I have my work cut out for me. I hope to post a practice video next week when I'm a little less sleep deprived.

      • YMT
      • 8 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Oh, I agree completely. My point was more about how Alex's teacher had said that left-hand alone was the only way to play that passage, something which I very much disagree with and find unsupported by the text. It irritates me when a teacher says, "This is the only way to do such-and-such" with no solid proof, and so I felt a need to point that out. 

       said:
      my piano teacher disabused me of the notion that some of the 32nd note figures in the first 12 measures can be played with the right hand. They cannot (must not)!
      • Pediatrician
      • a_weymann
      • 8 days ago
      • Reported - view

        you misunderstood. It is my fault since I tend to phrase things rather pointedly.   correctly read my comment as intending to say that my teacher wanted ME to play the fast arpeggi with the left hand, for the purpose of developing my technique, since I am using this piece as a study and am not preparing it for a concert performance.  already listed several great pianists who play these figures at least partly with their right hand, very much settling the matter. 

      • Pediatrician
      • a_weymann
      • 8 days ago
      • Reported - view

       in fact, my last piano teacher did also claim that it was Chopin who said that, and I contradicted him - now I see that he might have been right, after all. I think I heard the quote attributed to Liszt either by one of his biographers or, possibly, by Heinrich Neuhaus whose book I carried around like a bible when I was a teenager and read countless times. In this day and age, it would be a matter of seconds to verify whether “The Art of Piano Playing” attributes this quote to Liszt, but it matters not; the principle expressed in it was very much valued, as historical evidence amply shows, by both Liszt and Chopin. 

      • Larry_K
      • 8 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Well, I think Neuhaus got it wrong, and Karol Mikuli, one of Chopin’s students, wrote it in his notes but I am trying to find you a source in French. 

      Perhaps my French wife can find it for me.

      I think Chopin’s compositions, lessons, and playing embody the motto and Liszt’s do not.

      • Pediatrician
      • a_weymann
      • 8 days ago
      • Reported - view

       really? What about La legierezza, Au bord d’une source, Les jeux d’eau à la Villa d’Este, Feux follets, Ricordanza, La campanella, Waldesrauschen, Bénédiction de Dieu dans la solitude… plenty of suppleness needed, nay: demanded for these and countless other pieces by Liszt, I would posit. 

      • Larry_K
      • 8 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Liszt went in for gymnastics and power, the complete opposite of Chopin. 

      I still haven’t recovered from the migraine Liszt gave me after attending a recital of the Transcendental Etudes back in my 20s.

      I haven’t heard most of the pieces you mentioned but I detest La Campanella, in all of its pomposity.

      Did Liszt change later in life? Perhaps, but most of his compositions don’t attract me. It’s strange that Liszt revered Chopin and so opposed his way of playing. 

      I know this isn’t what you want to hear, sorry. If it makes you feel any better, I feel pretty much the same about Paganini and I spent a decade studying the violin.

      I listen to music for the emotions it evokes. I find Liszt lacking in a way that I do not find Chopin lacking. 

      And here is a reference from a book translated from the French of notes from Chopin’s students,

      “General suppleness ‘Have the body supple right to the tips of the toes,’ [Chopin used to say]. 31 Franchomme/ Picquet/ Anonymous, 32 p. 39 Suppleness was his great object. He repeated, without ceasing, during the lessons: ‘easily, easily’ [facilement, facilement]. Stiffness exasperated him. Dubois/ Niecks, II, p. 182 On beginning a lesson, Chopin’s main concern was to do away with every stiffness and convulsive or cramped movement of the hand, in order to obtain the primary requisite of good playing: souplesse [suppleness] and with it independence of the fingers.Mikuli, p. 3”

      — Chopin: Pianist and Teacher: As Seen by his Pupils by Jean-Jacques Eigeldinger”

      • hot4euterpe
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view
       said:
      Well, I think Neuhaus got it wrong, and Karol Mikuli, one of Chopin’s students, wrote it in his notes but I am trying to find you a source in French. 
      Perhaps my French wife can find it for me.
      I think Chopin’s compositions, lessons, and playing embody the motto and Liszt’s do not.

       Mikuli did write that Chopin would often say "facilement, facilement". However, Liszt's students said he would exclaim "souplesse, toujours souplesse!"

      These quotes are all secondhand anyway so the concept is more important than the wording. Neither were the first person to value suppleness of the hand, wrist and arm. This is and was a fundamental element of piano playing. It is about balancing relaxation with the ability to remain dynamic in movement to adjust seamlessly to changing challenges while maintaining economy of motion / effort. It is not about any one composer's style. Suppleness is required for Chopin, Liszt, Beethoven, Debussy etc. Chopin and Liszt both understood its value equally and it was a key component of their effortlessness at the piano. 

      • Mom, fitness instructor, lover of music
      • Michelle_Russell
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       I have come to think that for most music/composers I don't think I like, that it is often the way it is played that bothers me and not the music itself (tonal music, at least). For the longest time, I didn't like Chopin (GASP!!). Then I heard Jarred Dunn play Chopin and it was beautiful. I have learned that certain pianists play Chopin more to my liking than others, so that I have become quite picky about whom I listen to. I think it may be the same with Liszt. I agree that many interpretations of Liszt seem to privilege the physical virtuosity over the musical virtuosity. Much of his music, if played with more sensitivity and less overt bravura, has a ribbon of gentleness, longing, and hopefulness flowing through it. I think the pianist who seeks to truly understand the heart of this composer and the music (and who has the requisite skill) can bring this out regardless of the amount of pomposity that may be on the surface of the music. Though I do admit it has been rare for me to hear this side of his music, I hold out hope that some of the amateur pianists here can dig deep and find the beautiful longing that is within so much of Liszt's music.

      • Akzent oder Diminuendo?
      • Maria_F
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       I used to think that Chopin was boring, but I have definitely changed my mind. 

    • hot4euterpe
    • 7 days ago
    • Reported - view
     said:
    Liszt went in for gymnastics and power, the complete opposite of Chopin. 

     I'm afraid this a generalization that is not true in terms of either their repertoire or musicological study. This is just the way that Liszt and Chopin tend to be characterized as 'the devil and the angel' in past historical summaries.

    They each have pieces that are 'gymnastic and powerful" and they each have pieces of deep lyricism and thoughtful design. It is just that Liszt's most famous pieces tend toward his more flamboyant works because he really leaned into presentation and technical "pyrotechnics" in his earlier years. Given that he was capable of things at the piano that left the greatest pianists of the time wanting to quit, it is understandably difficult to separate him and his music from his virtuosity. The reality though is much more nuanced.

    Edit: I should add that I am not myself a huge Liszt fan (though I do like certain compositions and his biography is quite fascinating). I am, however, part musicologist and this particular discussion does come up frequently!

      • Larry_K
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Virtuosity for its own sake is empty and meaningless.

      I suppose other pianists wanted to quit because the public clamored for more noisy fireworks and wouldn’t listen to quieter, more introspective music.

      Imagine what Liszt would have done if he had access to amplification!  All of his amplifiers would have been set to 11!

        I suppose you’re right that Liszt has a better side but so much of his music has an iron fist in it that he makes me hate the piano as an instrument. 

      Schubert, Chopin, and Brahms don’t make me hate the piano.

      I am afraid that one cannot completely absolve the composer from how his music sounds when it is played, lol. The interpreter can only do so much.

      Dustin, did you see that I found a book of letters by Chopin’s students that wrote about “souplesse”?

      https://a.co/d/05f6p0ZK

      Anyway, I made a mistake to reply on this thread. I was tricked by a few French words. French has always been my downfall.

      I have learned my lesson and will avoid this thread in the future.

      • hot4euterpe
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       You are implying that Liszt's music is virtuosity for its own sake which is just objectively not true. I really urge you to consider some of the repertoire and listening suggestions that others have made, but it is your hill! 

      The book you are referring to is Eigeldinger's "Chopin: Pianist and Teacher". This book is extremely well known to academics and Chopin pianists, so yes I do know it (and have it on my shelf!). I did respond to this above and I also clarified what suppleness means musically as you seem to confuse it with an element of compositional style when it is in fact a characteristic of an individual's physical technique. It is a fundamental element of effective piano playing in general.

      • Larry_K
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Yes, I feel that Liszt’s music is virtuosic for its own sake. It’s flashy and it grabs audiences but it leaves me empty.

      I understand that suppleness is an element of physical technique but Liszt’s playing seems to be characterized by heavy resistance, from what I have read.

      This is not what Chopin taught.

      Does not the physical technique manifest itself in how the music sounds when it is played? 

      I haven’t found much subtlety in what I have heard from Liszt, at least not in his well known works.

      If this is a common discussion in musicology circles, I suppose I am not alone on my hill, am I?

      • hot4euterpe
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       

       said:
      If this is a common discussion in musicology circles, I suppose I am not alone on my hill, am I?

      The discussion I am referring to is how Liszt's music is often mischaracterized as only empty virtuosity and flamboyance based solely on his most commonly known pieces and a narrow knowledge of his life and personality that has been mythologized. 

      I don't really follow your other points about suppleness and hearing it in the musical composition itself. Suppleness and subtlety are entirely different things and you seem to be thinking more of the latter in how you are using the former. I myself have never encountered anything that describes Liszt's playing as "characterized by heavy resistance". I'm not even really sure what that means!

      You clearly have a visceral response to the Liszt you are familiar with. I personally have a similar distaste for Stravinsky; I recognize that he was still a remarkable composer though and I understand why others really enjoy his music even when I can't really connect with the aesthetic myself.

      • Larry_K
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Does not a lack of suppleness in the touch lead to a lack of subtlety in the sound produced by the piano? Doesn’t it just come out like pounding? 

      Why are the well known works by Liszt those that are flamboyant and lacking in the qualities I look for in piano music? I don’t feel this is the case with Chopin.

      Why aren’t those obscure pieces the ones that all people love?

      Yes, I have a visceral reaction to Liszt. It was that way many decades ago and it happened again in the Liszt listening party on Saturday when I ripped the headphones off of my head to get away from the sound.

      I should have learned my lesson way back when.

      Of course, Liszt was a great composer even if I cannot stand to listen to him.

      • hot4euterpe
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

      I think I'm going to tap out on this discussion! I'm not sure that a 4-week challenge celebrating the music of Liszt is the best place to adamantly express your dislike of Liszt but your distaste has been successfully communicated! =)

      • Larry_K
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       My apologies. I’m out.

      To think, it all came from what I believe was a misattribution of a quote to Liszt that was actually from Chopin. 

      I know nothing of the devil-angel characterization of Liszt-Chopin back in the day. Now, I’ll have to go read up on it. Clearly, they were on to something. :)

      • Akzent oder Diminuendo?
      • Maria_F
      • 7 days ago
      • Reported - view

       Liszt would not have set an amplifier to 11! You should read Alan Walker's Liszt trilogy. Liszt has been quite misunderstood for a long time!

    • Personal trainer
    • Judy_Kuan.1
    • 5 days ago
    • Reported - view

    A quick accountability check-in! I record all my practice in audio but rarely in video these days. Last week Thursday, I played thru Mazeppa for some Tonebase friends informally, and it was really helpful to identify where I am with it when playing "full out". The main thing that struck me was the gathering fatigue at the Allegro Deciso (m. 136) - mental fatigue of course, but mainly physical fatigue manifesting in feeling like moving thru mud / overall slower reactions that also impact accuracy. So this week, I've been workshopping the preceding Animato section and the Allegro Deciso section to really use arm weight for the melody and play the chromatic third middle line as 4-note chords (as Cortot and my teacher recommend) in a sweeping circular motion to save energy. And remembering to breathe. Slow because accuracy is suffering with those leaps of faith...  

      • Pediatrician
      • a_weymann
      • 5 days ago
      • Reported - view

       “Leaps of faith” is a great term for that passage. 😂

      • Personal trainer
      • Judy_Kuan.1
      • 5 days ago
      • Reported - view

       My poor husband & neighbors 🙈🙉

      • Noel_Nguyen
      • 5 days ago
      • Reported - view

        re: the stamina issue, I find that in such pieces it is actually better to keep the momentum going, at least mentally, even in the long quiet part(s). Otherwise the return to the virtuosic playing afterwards is too taxing for some reason.

      • Personal trainer
      • Judy_Kuan.1
      • 5 days ago
      • Reported - view

       That's a great observation. I think I have been focused too much on playing the "Animato" softer since it's mp, but unintentionally holding too much tension when trying to land less heavily. I should probably focus more on making it more playful, which might help keep up the mental and physical momentum

    • Ursina_Boehm
    • 5 days ago
    • Reported - view

    I am working on Liszt’s transcription of Frühlingsglaube by Schubert. Here is a first recording of the beginning. It is really all about making the piano sing. A lot of voicing I have to work on: Upper right hand, upper left hand, sometimes split up between both hands. This part is still very close to the original Schubert song. The real work is still to come 😂🎹😂

    https://youtu.be/Uj9N7iilV2M?is=TWEY5kxgGvskVIPx

      • Personal trainer
      • Judy_Kuan.1
      • 5 days ago
      • Reported - view

       So beautiful already!

Content aside

  • 2 Likes
  • 4 days agoLast active
  • 119Replies
  • 355Views
  • 18 Following